Lower Lid Laxity is Negatively Correlated with Improvement of the Ocular Surface Disease Index in Dry Eye Treatment

Oh, Seung Hoon; Lyu, Byul; Yim, Hye Bin; Lee, Na Young

doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1015142

Cited by 8 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…OSDI is a clinically validated and widely used PRO questionnaire that has a multitude of advantages. It has been used to monitor treatment response for DED, 17 and to rule in possible clinical signs. 18 Moreover, it has also been used to validate newly introduced diagnostic tests that could potentially help in the assessment of the disease.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing SPEED and OSDI Questionnaires in a Non-Clinical Sample

Hashmani¹,

Munaf²,

Saleem³

et al. 2021

OPTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To compare the performance of OSDI and SPEED questionnaires in a non-clinical sample in Pakistan. Methods: SPEED and OSDI questionnaires were simultaneously administered to a sample of 600 participants in Pakistan with an average age of 31.0 ± 10.1 years. Results: Mean SPEED scores were calculated according to the OSDI categories and were found to be 3. 33 ± 3.44, 5.45 ± 3.77, 7.86 ± 4.33, and 9.39 ± 4.56 for the normal, mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. Using Cronbach's alpha, the total OSDI and SPEED scores were calculated to be 0.924 and 0.879, respectively. A receiver operating curve was plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was estimated to be 0.791. Using this curve, the cutoff score for the SPEED questionnaire was found to be 4.00 (P < 0.001). Conclusion:The SPEED questionnaire can be used as an effective alternative to the OSDI.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%