1988
DOI: 10.1109/29.90372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LPC speech coding based on variable-length segment quantization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, segment-based speech coders, such as segment vocoders [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], phonetic vocoders [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and text-to-speech (TTS)-based speech coders [34][35][36], were proposed to overcome this limitation. Those coders generally process speech at segment level instead of sample or frame level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, segment-based speech coders, such as segment vocoders [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], phonetic vocoders [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and text-to-speech (TTS)-based speech coders [34][35][36], were proposed to overcome this limitation. Those coders generally process speech at segment level instead of sample or frame level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For segment-based speech coding, the prosodic information associated with each segmental unit is usually encoded directly after quantization without considering underlying prosodic models. Methods proposed for encoding segmental pitch contour include scalar-quantization of segmental mean value [11,13] or values at segmental end points [17], vector-quantization [25,31], scalar-quantization after being parameterized by piecewise linear approximation (PLA) [12,18,19,24,32,33,36], the frame-by-frame scheme as used in the frame-based coder [14,15,21,23,27,28], and quantization by using stored pitch contour patterns [34]. For segment duration, it is usually directly encoded/scalar-quantized [11, 12, 15, 17-19, 23, 24, 26-28], or vector-quantized [29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations