2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1905.05442
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LSANet: Feature Learning on Point Sets by Local Spatial Aware Layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E.g., RandLA-Net [95] achieves an overall IoU of 76.0% on the reduced-8 subset of Semantic3D, but a very low IOU of 41.1% on the class of hardscape. • The majority of existing approaches [5], [27], [52], [170], [171] work on small point clouds (e.g., 1m×1m with 4096 points). In practice, the point clouds acquired by depth sensors are usually immense and large-scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…E.g., RandLA-Net [95] achieves an overall IoU of 76.0% on the reduced-8 subset of Semantic3D, but a very low IOU of 41.1% on the class of hardscape. • The majority of existing approaches [5], [27], [52], [170], [171] work on small point clouds (e.g., 1m×1m with 4096 points). In practice, the point clouds acquired by depth sensors are usually immense and large-scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This module is less sensitive to outliers and can select a representative subset of points. To better capture the spatial distribution of a point cloud, Chen et al [171] proposed a Local Spatial Aware (LSA) layer to learn spatial awareness weights based on the spatial layouts and the local structures of point clouds. Similar to CRF, Zhao et al [172] proposed an Attention-based Score Refinement (ASR) module to post-process the segmentation results produced by the network.…”
Section: Hybrid Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically designed layers are frequently imported for better local feature extraction. LSANet [67] improved feature extraction by introducing a novel Local Spatial Aware (LSA) layer, which takes the spatial distribution of point clouds into account by Spatial Distribution Weights (SDWs). PyramNet [68] introduced two novel operators, Graph Embedding Module (GEM) and Pyramid Attention Network (PAN), resulting in more accurate local feature extraction.…”
Section: B Point-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PointNet [10] PointNet++ [60] Anand et al [56] Wolf et al [57] Weinmann et al [59] RF_MSSF[58] MS+CU [61] PointSIFT [62] SO-Net [64] RandLA-Net [52] Engelmann et al [63] PAT [66] LSANet [67] PyramNet [68] PointCNN [69] Tangent Convolution [75] DAR-Net [76] A-CNN [70] KPConv [71] ShellNet [77] DPC [72] PointAtrousGraph [74] PointAtrousNet [73] G+RCU [61] RSNet [78] SPLATNet [79] LatticeNet [81] Lawin et al [83] Boulch et al [84] SqueezeSeg [11] SqueezeSegV2[] Gao et al [86] RangeNet++ [87] DeepTemporalSeg [88] LiSeg [89] PointSeg [90] RIU-Net [91] Huang et al [92] SEGCloud [93] FCPN [94] 3DCNN-DQN-RNN[100] SSCN [95] Zhang et al [96] ScanComplete [97] VV-NET [98] VolMap [99] SPG [101] GACNet [102] Jiang et al…”
Section: D Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Table 4, our RandLA-Net achieves on-par or better performance than state-of-the-art methods. Note that, most of these baselines [38,29,64,63,51,6] tend to use sophisticated but expensive operations or samplings to optimize the networks on small blocks (e.g., 1×1 meter) of point clouds, and the relatively small rooms act in their favours to be divided into tiny blocks. By contrast, RandLA-Net takes the entire rooms as input and is able to efficiently infer per-point semantics in a single pass.…”
Section: Semantic Segmentation On Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%