2020
DOI: 10.3791/60782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<em>Agrobacterium</em>-Mediated Immature Embryo Transformation of Recalcitrant Maize Inbred Lines Using Morphogenic Genes

Abstract: Demonstrated here is a detailed protocol for Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of maize inbred lines using morphogenic genes Baby boom (Bbm) and Wuschel2 (Wus2). Bbm is regulated by the maize phospholipid transferase gene (Pltp) promoter, and Wus2 is under the control of a maize auxin-inducible (Axig1) promoter. An Agrobacterium strain carrying these morphogenic genes on transfer DNA (T-DNA) and extra copies of Agrobacterium virulence (vir) genes are used to infect maize immature embryo explants. S… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model species Arabidopsis thaliana can be easily transformed via the floral dip method with Agrobacteria delivery of genetic material, a process which can generate stable transgenic seed within 3-5 weeks [12]. In contrast, maize transformation methods are more laborious and time consuming, taking up to 6 months after the transformation event to generate transgenic seed [13][14][15][16][17]. Typically, immature embryo-derived callus tissue is transformed either by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of transgenes and both processes have a transformation rate efficiency of about 12-30% [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model species Arabidopsis thaliana can be easily transformed via the floral dip method with Agrobacteria delivery of genetic material, a process which can generate stable transgenic seed within 3-5 weeks [12]. In contrast, maize transformation methods are more laborious and time consuming, taking up to 6 months after the transformation event to generate transgenic seed [13][14][15][16][17]. Typically, immature embryo-derived callus tissue is transformed either by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of transgenes and both processes have a transformation rate efficiency of about 12-30% [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model species Arabidopsis thaliana can be easily transformed via the oral dip method with Agrobacteria delivery of genetic material, a process which can generate stable transgenic seed within 3-5 weeks [12]. In contrast, maize transformation methods are more laborious and time consuming, taking up to 6 months after the transformation event to generate transgenic seed [13][14][15][16][17] . Typically, immature embryo-derived callus tissue is transformed either by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of transgenes and both processes have a transformation rate e ciency of about 12-30% [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFMM-AT transformation experiments for delivery of the construct carrying CRISPR reagents were carried out using standard transformation protocol similar to Hi-II genotype described previously (Wang and Frame, 2004 ) with modifications. Briefly, the media of Wang and Frame ( 2004 ) were replaced with the following media ( Supplementary Material ): Liquid Infection Medium (700A), Cocultivation Medium (562V), Callus Development Medium (605J or 605T), Selection Media I and II, and Shoot Formation Medium (289O plus 3 mg/L bialaphos) per Lowe et al ( 2016 ), Jones et al ( 2019 ) and Masters et al ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFMM plants are short enough to grow on stackable shelves with a proper lighting system. The original FFMM lines are not capable of genetic transformation by traditional protocols, though they work very well with the QuickCorn Babyboom/Wuschel morphogenic genes technology (Lowe et al, 2016(Lowe et al, , 2018Jones et al, 2019;Masters et al, 2020). This morphogenic gene technology, while effective, does have some limitations such as large construct size and restrictive licensing options.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%