2014
DOI: 10.3406/estat.2014.10416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<i>EU‑Silc/SRCV</i>, ambition et apport d’une approche longitudinale et transversale des revenus et des conditions de vie, en France et en Europe

Abstract: Insee, Division conditions de vie des ménages. ** Insee, Division revenus et patrimoine des ménages.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the regressivity of the TAX_SUB scenario can be 17 explained by the impact of subsidies on fresh fruits and vegetables. Comparing the variations in quantities for households below the poverty line (Burricand et al, 2012) to those for the average population shows that the baseline quantities are lower in lower-income households (180 g vs 354 g/capita/day) and that the rate of increase post-TAX_SUB is lower (17.2% vs 23.2%). As the Marshallian elasticities are very similar for the two sample populations (appendix online), total and households below the poverty line, this finding can be interpreted as a pure quantity effect.…”
Section: A Revenue-neutral Approach: Taxes/subsidies Using the Source...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the regressivity of the TAX_SUB scenario can be 17 explained by the impact of subsidies on fresh fruits and vegetables. Comparing the variations in quantities for households below the poverty line (Burricand et al, 2012) to those for the average population shows that the baseline quantities are lower in lower-income households (180 g vs 354 g/capita/day) and that the rate of increase post-TAX_SUB is lower (17.2% vs 23.2%). As the Marshallian elasticities are very similar for the two sample populations (appendix online), total and households below the poverty line, this finding can be interpreted as a pure quantity effect.…”
Section: A Revenue-neutral Approach: Taxes/subsidies Using the Source...mentioning
confidence: 99%