2019
DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s193196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Carvedilol vs endoscopic band ligation for the prevention of variceal bleeding: a meta-analysis</p>

Abstract: ObjectiveVariceal hemorrhage is the primary driver of mortality in patients with portal hypertension. Recent guidelines recommended that patients with esophageal varices should receive endoscopic band ligation (EBL) or carvedilol as prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Several clinical trials have compared carvedilol use with EBL intervention, yielding controversial results. The present study aimed to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the benefits and harms of carvedilol vs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the most recent systematic review/meta-analysis evaluating carvedilol versus EBL, Tian et al reported no significant difference in variceal bleeding between the carvedilol and EBL groups (RR 0.86, 95 %CI 0.60 to 1.23). Moreover, no significant difference was observed for all-cause mortality (RR 0.82, 95 %CI 0.44 to 1.53) or for bleeding-related deaths (RR 0.85, 95 %CI 0.39 to 1.87) 18 .…”
Section: Endoscopic Screening For High Risk Esophagogastric Varices A...mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the most recent systematic review/meta-analysis evaluating carvedilol versus EBL, Tian et al reported no significant difference in variceal bleeding between the carvedilol and EBL groups (RR 0.86, 95 %CI 0.60 to 1.23). Moreover, no significant difference was observed for all-cause mortality (RR 0.82, 95 %CI 0.44 to 1.53) or for bleeding-related deaths (RR 0.85, 95 %CI 0.39 to 1.87) 18 .…”
Section: Endoscopic Screening For High Risk Esophagogastric Varices A...mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…reported no significant difference in variceal bleeding between the carvedilol and EBL groups (RR 0.86, 95 %CI 0.60 to 1.23). Moreover, no significant difference was observed for all-cause mortality (RR 0.82, 95 %CI 0.44 to 1.53) or for bleeding-related deaths (RR 0.85, 95 %CI 0.39 to 1.87)[18]. ESGE recommends that, in those patients unable to receive NSBB therapy with a screening upper GI endoscopy that does not demonstrate high risk varices, surveillance endoscopy should be performed every 2 years if there is ongoing active liver disease or every 3 years if the underlying liver disease is quiescent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Treatment with NSBBs (propranolol, nadolol, or carvedilol) should be considered for the prevention of decompensation in patients with CSPH. In particular, carvedilol should be preferred as the first choice in compensated cirrhosis [ 10 ], since it is more effective at reducing HVPG and preventing decompensation, has better tolerance than traditional NSBBs, and has been demonstrated to improve survival [ 26 ].…”
Section: Prevention and Management Of Variceal Bleedingmentioning
confidence: 99%