2020
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s268126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Intracapsular Implantation and Intrascleral Fixation Using the Same Model of Intraocular Lens</p>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Torii et al compared clinical outcomes between intracapsular implantation and intrascleral fixation of the same IOL; the mean error was 0.22 ± 0.17 and 0.86 ± 0.59D, and the postoperative anterior chamber depth was 4.65 ± 0.23 and 4.98 ± 0.61 mm, respectively. 26 With our method, the IOL haptics located out-of-the-bag and fixed in the scleral tunnels might pull up the IOL optic located in-the-bag. Postoperative refraction tended toward myopia, especially in the dual haptic fixation group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 Torii et al compared clinical outcomes between intracapsular implantation and intrascleral fixation of the same IOL; the mean error was 0.22 ± 0.17 and 0.86 ± 0.59D, and the postoperative anterior chamber depth was 4.65 ± 0.23 and 4.98 ± 0.61 mm, respectively. 26 With our method, the IOL haptics located out-of-the-bag and fixed in the scleral tunnels might pull up the IOL optic located in-the-bag. Postoperative refraction tended toward myopia, especially in the dual haptic fixation group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Postoperative visual function deterioration is significantly associated with IOL malpositioning and refractive errors, as well as with high-order aberrations caused by IOL tilting and decentration. 22,23,25 Many reports have found that conventional intrascleral IOL fixation 23,25,26 combined with capsulectomy and vitrectomy can result in large refractive errors and high-order aberrations. The postoperative refractive prediction error in this study was −0.68 ± 0.95 D (myopia in 78.4% of cases), and was larger in the dual haptic fixation group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study reported an average IOL tilt of 5.21°±1.47° during in-the-bag IOL implantation in conventional cataract surgery. 15 However, we were unable to evaluate the postoperative IOL tilt due to the unavailability of anterior segment optical coherence tomography. An IOL tilt may affect visual function by causing coma aberration and astigmatism, thereby necessitating an evaluation of the amount of IOL tilt and an improvement in the technique to achieve a tilt similar to that of in-the-bag IOL implantation cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, a previous study comparing intrascleral fixation with cataract surgery using the same type of in-the-bag IOL implantation technique reported that the mean absolute prediction error of intrascleral fixation was greater than that of intracapsular implantation. 15 Once the hook haptics of hsh-IOL are buried in the sclera, the fixation becomes stable However, it is difficult to move and adjust the position of the haptics. This warrants the need for future studies to develop a technique to further reduce the predicted refractive error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation