2020
DOI: 10.2147/jir.s282722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Identification of Key Genes Associated with Changes in the Host Response to Severe Burn Shock: A Bioinformatics Analysis with Data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) Database</p>

Abstract: Background: Patients with severe burns continue to display a high mortality rate during the initial shock period. The precise molecular mechanism underlying the change in host response during severe burn shock remains unknown. This study aimed to identify key genes leading to the change in host response during burn shock. Methods: The GSE77791 dataset, which was utilized in a previous study that compared hydrocortisone administration to placebo (NaCl 0.9%) in the inflammatory reaction of severe burn shock, was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioinformatics study on the data derived from gene chips has become a promising and efficient tool to screen the significant genetic or epigenetic variations associated with multiple diseases. 16 For the first time, we attempted to use public dataset to evaluate the distinct expression pattern of m6A regulators in human AAA tissues. With further bioinformatics analyses, including differential expression, target gene prediction, functional enrichment analysis, protein–protein interaction (PPI) and competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network construction, we sought to construct the whole picture of m6A regulators in AAA disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioinformatics study on the data derived from gene chips has become a promising and efficient tool to screen the significant genetic or epigenetic variations associated with multiple diseases. 16 For the first time, we attempted to use public dataset to evaluate the distinct expression pattern of m6A regulators in human AAA tissues. With further bioinformatics analyses, including differential expression, target gene prediction, functional enrichment analysis, protein–protein interaction (PPI) and competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network construction, we sought to construct the whole picture of m6A regulators in AAA disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have constructed a complex interaction network to identify the key nodes through their common DEGs. This comprehensive bioinformatics method has been proven to be reliable in a variety of diseases ( 43 , 44 ). In addition, we also analyzed related TFs and verified their expression levels in the original data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrast to prognostic models for platelet, coagulation disorders, IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, Burn Severity Index ( ABSI ) score, Ryan score, Belgium Outcome Burn Injury ( BOBI ) score and modi ed Baux score, our prognostic model was based on gene expression pro le and had higher accuracy and more convenient for clinical operation. [8][9][10] Others use bioinformatics methods to study the pathophysiology of severe burns, but most are limited to animal models or have unstable and inaccurate prognostic indicators [43][44][45] . We rst introduced WGCNA, CIBERSORT, GSVA and Lasso in the analysis to nd prognostic factors from the pathophysiological mechanism of immunosuppression after severe burn, so our prognostic model is more stable and reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%