2020
DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s232792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Less Pain, Better Sleep? The Effect of a Multidisciplinary Back Pain App on Sleep Quality in Individuals Suffering from Back Pain – a Secondary Analysis of App User Data</p>

Abstract: Purpose: Mobile health solutions are finding their way into health systems. The Kaia app has been shown to be able to reduce back pain in two studies. Since pain often comes along with disturbed sleep and both symptoms are strongly related we investigated whether the Kaia app training is associated with improved sleep quality. Methods: User data of individuals with back pain were collected in two app versions (cohort 1: N = 180; cohort 2: N = 159). We analyzed the ratings of sleep quality and pain intensity on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 12 studies, 6 (50%) [28][29][30][31][32][33] were RCTs and 4 (33%) [34][35][36][37] had a retrospective cohort design, whereas the remaining 2 (17%) were a retrospective evaluation [38] and a prospective single-arm trial [39], respectively. Of the 12 studies, 5 (42%) were published in 2020 [28,33,34,37,39], 3 (25%) in 2019 [29][30][31], 3 (25%) in 2018 [32,36,38], and 1 (8%) in 2017 [35]; moreover, 2 (17%) each were conducted in the United States [30,34], Germany [28,31], and China [29,38], 1 (8%) in India [32], and 1 (8%) in Jordan [33], whereas the remaining 3 (25%) were conducted in multiple countries. Of these 3 studies, 1 was conducted in Denmark and Norway [39] and 1 included participants from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland [35].…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 12 studies, 6 (50%) [28][29][30][31][32][33] were RCTs and 4 (33%) [34][35][36][37] had a retrospective cohort design, whereas the remaining 2 (17%) were a retrospective evaluation [38] and a prospective single-arm trial [39], respectively. Of the 12 studies, 5 (42%) were published in 2020 [28,33,34,37,39], 3 (25%) in 2019 [29][30][31], 3 (25%) in 2018 [32,36,38], and 1 (8%) in 2017 [35]; moreover, 2 (17%) each were conducted in the United States [30,34], Germany [28,31], and China [29,38], 1 (8%) in India [32], and 1 (8%) in Jordan [33], whereas the remaining 3 (25%) were conducted in multiple countries. Of these 3 studies, 1 was conducted in Denmark and Norway [39] and 1 included participants from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland [35].…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study durations with regard to the digital therapeutic intervention did not vary significantly. In 58% (7/12) [28,[30][31][32]34,35,37] of the studies, the intervention was investigated for 12 weeks or 3 months, 17% (2/12) [33,39] had an intervention duration of 6 weeks, 17% (2/12) had an intervention duration of 24 weeks [36] and 24 months [29], whereas in 8% (1/12) [38], the duration was inconsistent and not clearly reported.…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations