2020
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.461.3.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p><strong><em>Matelea ojadapantha </em></strong><strong>(Apocynaceae; Asclepiadoideae; Gonolobeae; Gonolobinae), a new species from México</strong></p>

Abstract: A new species of Matelea from central and southern México with green to black corollas and pubescent lobes is described here: Matelea ojadapantha. This taxon is morphologically similar to M. schaffneri and M. atrostellata but differs by the corolla and corona morphology and has a disjunct geographic distribution. Descriptions, illustrations, morphological comparisons, map of the distributions of this species as well as their conservation status is provided. This discovery highlights México as a center of diver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, though some characters have been useful to delimit clades, more evidence and documentation, including stronger phylogenetic hypotheses, are still necessary (McDonnell et al, 2018). Despite the lack of monophyly of Matelea s.l., several new species have been described following the traditional circumscription of the genus (Cortez et al, 2018; Alvarado-Cárdenas et al, 2020; Jiménez & Hidalgo-Mora, 2021; Juárez-Jaimes et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, though some characters have been useful to delimit clades, more evidence and documentation, including stronger phylogenetic hypotheses, are still necessary (McDonnell et al, 2018). Despite the lack of monophyly of Matelea s.l., several new species have been described following the traditional circumscription of the genus (Cortez et al, 2018; Alvarado-Cárdenas et al, 2020; Jiménez & Hidalgo-Mora, 2021; Juárez-Jaimes et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%