2020
DOI: 10.2147/cia.s234938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>Short-Term Effects of a Deterioration of General Health on the Oral Health of Nursing-Home Residents</p>

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify how changes to general health might affect the oral health of nursing-home residents over a six-month period. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in nine nursing homes in Germany. Sociodemographic and general data were collected at baseline and after six months. Complete baseline and follow-up data were available for 114 participants. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) were used to identify the presence and, if applic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Caries experience (DMFT) was calculated in six types of disadvantaged individuals, of which the elderly were those with the highest DMFT 18.7 SD 2.4 ([95% CI 13.5–24]; 1160 participants, 17 studies) [ 25 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 40 , 41 , 44 , 48 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ], followed by homeless subjects with DMFT 17.3 SD 0.4 ([95% CI 12.6–22.1]; 100 participants, two studies) [ 67 , 68 ], immigrants with 14.9 SD 0.9 ([95% CI 9.6–18.7]; 843 participants, two studies) [ 51 , 52 ], alcohol and drug abusers with 12.9 SD 0.8 ([95% CI 11.2–14.6]; 1891 participants, nine studies) [ 49 , 50 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ], low-income people with9.9 SD 0.5 ([95% CI 3–16.7];3043 participants, two studies) [ 60 , 76 ], low-education people with 9.8 SD0.03 ([95% CI 9.4–10.2]; 3043 participants, two studies) [ 60 , 76 ] and prisoners with 8.9 SD 0.8 ([95% CI 6.3–10.4]; 802 participants, three studies) [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Lower DMFT was found in sex workers with 2.3 (249 participants) [ 77 ] and in subjects who work without any specific qualification with 2.9 (510 participants) [ 78 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Caries experience (DMFT) was calculated in six types of disadvantaged individuals, of which the elderly were those with the highest DMFT 18.7 SD 2.4 ([95% CI 13.5–24]; 1160 participants, 17 studies) [ 25 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 34 , 40 , 41 , 44 , 48 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ], followed by homeless subjects with DMFT 17.3 SD 0.4 ([95% CI 12.6–22.1]; 100 participants, two studies) [ 67 , 68 ], immigrants with 14.9 SD 0.9 ([95% CI 9.6–18.7]; 843 participants, two studies) [ 51 , 52 ], alcohol and drug abusers with 12.9 SD 0.8 ([95% CI 11.2–14.6]; 1891 participants, nine studies) [ 49 , 50 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 ], low-income people with9.9 SD 0.5 ([95% CI 3–16.7];3043 participants, two studies) [ 60 , 76 ], low-education people with 9.8 SD0.03 ([95% CI 9.4–10.2]; 3043 participants, two studies) [ 60 , 76 ] and prisoners with 8.9 SD 0.8 ([95% CI 6.3–10.4]; 802 participants, three studies) [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Lower DMFT was found in sex workers with 2.3 (249 participants) [ 77 ] and in subjects who work without any specific qualification with 2.9 (510 participants) [ 78 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, a greater probability of having a higher DMFT index was found in low-education people (OR 1.40 [95% CI 1.29–1.52], p < 0.05; 6051 participants) [ 57 ], in low-income people (OR 3.7 [95% CI 2.8–4.6], p < 0.05; 1695 participants, two studies, I 2 = 78%) [ 56 , 76 ] and in professionals who sustain an excessive hourly workload (>40 h of overtime) (OR 2.56 [95% CI 1.23–5.33] p = 0.012 to OR 3.01 [95% CI 1.13–7.97] p = 0.027; 950 participants) [ 79 , 80 ]. Moreover, institutionalized elderly people (resident in care homes) showed a higher caries experience than non-institutionalized elderly people with a DMFT 25.4 SD 2.1 ([95% CI 19.9–30.9]; 2608 participants, six studies) versus 16.1 SD 2.1 ([95% CI 11.2–21]; 8276 participants, nine studies) [ 29 , 31 , 34 , 40 , 41 , 44 , 48 , 60 , 61 , 63 , 64 , 81 , 82 ]. This difference between the two was essentially due to an increased number of teeth lost because of caries, with MT 21.4 SD 2.9 ([95% CI 12.2–30.6]; 2123 participants, seven studies) in institutionalized elderly individuals versus 9.7 SD 0.5 ([95% CI 8.4–11]; 7641 participants, four studies) in non-institutionalized ones [ 29 , 31 , 34 , 40 , 41 , 48 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 66 , 81 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, long-term elderly inpatients with schizophrenia have cognitive impairments themselves. Their limited oral self-maintenance capacity, combined with the potential conflict between respecting patients' autonomy and providing good daily care ( 49 ), makes many effective oral care practices difficult to implement, further exacerbating the lack of oral health management in this population. This condition may not only aggravate the cognitive impairment of patients and affect the quality of life but also increase the risk of respiratory nosocomial infection and seriously hamper the improvement of the quality of medical services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of their oral health reveals a poor situation in terms of dental status, periodontal situation and cleanliness of the dentures, the tongue or the oral cavity (Al Baker et al, 2017; Bilder et al, 2014; Henriksen et al, 2004; Klotz et al, 2020; Nitschke & Muller, 2004; Ozkan et al, 2011; Simons et al, 2001; van der Putten et al, 2014; Weyant et al, 1993). This impaired oral health is influenced by multiple general health problems such as dementia, frailty, psychological disorders, or malnutrition and the according multiple drugs therapy (Klotz et al, 2020). A reduced oral health could influence the general health status, and especially regarding nutritional status, cardiovascular diseases, or aspiration pneumonia (Altenhoevel et al, 2012; Klotz et al, 2018; Komiyama et al, 2016; Paganini‐Hill et al, 2011; Rohrig et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%