1997
DOI: 10.1117/12.280846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Automated detection and classification of sea mines in sonar imagery</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
76
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, such objects will also block the signal from reaching the seabed behind them, thus creating a shadow region. This motivated Dobeck et al to construct a matched filter that comprises a highlight region, dead-zone, and shadow region [4]. Depending on seabed elevation, the shadow length will vary significantly with respect to range.…”
Section: Matched Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, such objects will also block the signal from reaching the seabed behind them, thus creating a shadow region. This motivated Dobeck et al to construct a matched filter that comprises a highlight region, dead-zone, and shadow region [4]. Depending on seabed elevation, the shadow length will vary significantly with respect to range.…”
Section: Matched Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Dobeck et al [4], our matched filter is constructed as a superposition of rasied cosines rather than their step functions. Our reasoning is motivated by the fact that the sand ripples in our data cannot be well approximated by pure sinusoidal plane waves.…”
Section: Matched Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sea-mine images were segmented to three regions: echo, shadow, and sea-bottom reverberation areas, based on different MRF models, estimated for the different classes. Dobeck et al [4] implemented a matched filter, K-nearest neighbor neural network classifier, and a discriminatory filter classifier to detect such mine-like objects in sonar images. The classification process employs up to 45 features for every possible mine-like object.…”
Section: Sea-mine Sonar Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification process employs up to 45 features for every possible mine-like object. The detection in [4] is based on a large collection of mine-like objects signatures. In the example presented here, no real signature examples are used for defining the signal subspace.…”
Section: Sea-mine Sonar Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%