1996
DOI: 10.1117/12.237511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Comparing laser-induced retinal damage from ir wavelengths to that from visible wavelengths</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the 1.3-1.4 µm bioeffects studies published earlier by our laboratory [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], investigations of laser-tissue interactions in this wavelength range are few in number and there is a paucity of ocular damage threshold data to support laser safety standard [8,9] maximum permissible exposure levels (MPEs). Ocular tissue absorption coefficients vary rapidly with wavelength across the near-IR and the transition region between the near-IR and far-IR spectral ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the 1.3-1.4 µm bioeffects studies published earlier by our laboratory [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], investigations of laser-tissue interactions in this wavelength range are few in number and there is a paucity of ocular damage threshold data to support laser safety standard [8,9] maximum permissible exposure levels (MPEs). Ocular tissue absorption coefficients vary rapidly with wavelength across the near-IR and the transition region between the near-IR and far-IR spectral ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical NIR retinal lesion did not appear within the first hour post-exposure (Zuclich, Gagliano et al 1995;Zuclich, Schuschereba et al 1997;Zuclich, Zwick et al 1998;Zuclich, Lund et al 2001). By 24-hours post-exposure, the NIR lesions were evident, characterized by a larger more reflective spot compared to the 532-nm argon marker (Zuclich, Schuschereba et al 1997 The NIR lesions appeared to stabilize after 48 hours (Zuclich, Schuschereba et al 1996;Zuclich, Schuschereba et al 1997;Zuclich, Zwick et al 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, NIR threshold lesions involving full-retinal thickness and late-onset inflammation were not observed at visible or UV wavelengths (Zuclich, Schuschereba et al 1997) In general, the sensory retina is mostly transparent to retinal hazard wavelengths (Henderson and Schulmeister 2004). Rich with melanin granules, the RPE is believed to absorb most of the energy in the visible range.…”
Section: Criteria 1: Absorbance Of the Rpe And Water Content Of The Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, it was hypothesized that thermal lensing would significantly influence ocular damage thresholds induced by these lasers. 12,[16][17][18][19][20] Damage threshold experiments at 1319 nm using rhesus models indicate that the 24 h ED50 threshold for a 80 ms exposure is 14.5 W of measured power for a 5 mm beam entering the eye, 12 where ED50 is the amount of energy required to create a minimal visible lesion in 50% of exposures. Based on this series of investigations, it was determined that the current ANSI Z136.1-2007 standard (0.072 J ⋅ cm −2 , exposure duration of 1 s for wavelengths between 1200 and 1400 nm) was extremely conservative (approximately 10× lower) than necessary in order to meet the universally accepted margin of safety (10% of the ED50).…”
Section: Safety Considerations At 1319 Nmmentioning
confidence: 99%