1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.309690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Description of polarization dispersion effects in embedded fiber optic sensors using the principal states of polarization</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of PDL , the PSPs are mutually orthogonal and the third term in (7) vanishes. Formulas for the polarization-dependent effective delay in the absence of PDL first appeared in [7], where we assumed that DGD , and more recently in [8] and [10], where now the DGD could take any value DGD . Since the DGD measured in our system was always at most a few picoseconds, while the RF frequency was 2.5 GHz, the condition DGD is clearly satisfied.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of PDL , the PSPs are mutually orthogonal and the third term in (7) vanishes. Formulas for the polarization-dependent effective delay in the absence of PDL first appeared in [7], where we assumed that DGD , and more recently in [8] and [10], where now the DGD could take any value DGD . Since the DGD measured in our system was always at most a few picoseconds, while the RF frequency was 2.5 GHz, the condition DGD is clearly satisfied.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the DGD measured in our system was always at most a few picoseconds, while the RF frequency was 2.5 GHz, the condition DGD is clearly satisfied. In this case, the polarization-dependent group delay is simply a weighted average of the maximum and minimum group delays with and weights, respectively [7]. Anticipating the possibility of some PDL in our sensor, we now assume that in (8), so that the effective delay in the presence of PDL becomes (Fig.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%