1999
DOI: 10.1117/12.360480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Interferometric measurement for improved understanding of boundary effects in micromachined beams</title>

Abstract: cm-i-iMicromachined beams are commonly used to measure material properties in MEMS. Such measurements are complicated by the fact that boundary effects at the ends of the beams have a significant effect on the properties being measured. In an effort to improve the accuracy and resolution of such measurements, we are conducting a study of support post compliance in cantilever and fixed-fixed beams. Three different support post designs have been analyzed by finite element modeling. The results are then compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where, Young's modulus ( 170 GPa for polysilicon [18]); spacing between the beam and the substrate; thickness of the polysilicon beams [13]. Details on the use of (1) and the numerical determination of the detachment length can be found elsewhere [9].…”
Section: Micromachine Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, Young's modulus ( 170 GPa for polysilicon [18]); spacing between the beam and the substrate; thickness of the polysilicon beams [13]. Details on the use of (1) and the numerical determination of the detachment length can be found elsewhere [9].…”
Section: Micromachine Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most micromachined cantilevers, the Young's modulus is not known a priori. Nonidealities such as nonzero , nonzero takeoff angle [19]- [23] [ Fig. 1(a)] and nonzero support post torsional compliance [ Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to variations in the boundary conditions at the supporting edges. [30][31][32] This design shows a much lower stress levels in both the membrane and cantilever suspensions compared to the other designs discussed earlier.…”
Section: Type "C" Designmentioning
confidence: 82%