2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.532405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Low-frequency MTF estimation for digital imaging devices using slanted-edge analysis</title>

Abstract: Modulation transfer function (MTF) metrology and interpretation for digital image capture devices has usually concentrated on mid-to high-frequency information, relative to the half-sampling frequency. These regions typically quantify characteristics and operations such as sharpening, limiting resolution, and aliasing. However, a potential wealth of low-frequency, visually significant information is often masked in existing measurement results because of spatial data truncation. For print or document scanners,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The candidate edge must also meet contrast and noise requirements for selection (Jain, 1989). This is because, the MTF value obtained with high contrast edge target is always larger than that obtained with lower contrast target for a given spatial frequency; therefore, when the MTF of a system is presented, the contrast of the line pair used to measure the MTF should be given (Williams, 2004). In our case the maximum contrast of the target image obtained is 37.68% calculated by Michelson formula (Michelson, 1927).…”
Section: Edge Identificationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The candidate edge must also meet contrast and noise requirements for selection (Jain, 1989). This is because, the MTF value obtained with high contrast edge target is always larger than that obtained with lower contrast target for a given spatial frequency; therefore, when the MTF of a system is presented, the contrast of the line pair used to measure the MTF should be given (Williams, 2004). In our case the maximum contrast of the target image obtained is 37.68% calculated by Michelson formula (Michelson, 1927).…”
Section: Edge Identificationmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We measured the system MTF using the ISO standard ISO 12233 [6]. This method measures the system response to a slanted edge.…”
Section: Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet another image-based method would be to utilize an edge target akin to the widely used slantededge measurement method [17][18][19]. While this method yields reliable MTF data, care should be exercised in extending this approach to PTF measurement, because the latter is highly sensitive to sampling phase.…”
Section: B Phase Transfer Function Measurement Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%