1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.323099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Modification of the Koster interferometer for automatization of gauge block measurements</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be made using a Birge ratio test which compares the observed spread of the results with spread expected from individual uncertainties. The Birge ratio can be calculated as in (7). …”
Section: Tests Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be made using a Birge ratio test which compares the observed spread of the results with spread expected from individual uncertainties. The Birge ratio can be calculated as in (7). …”
Section: Tests Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5]. Some later interferometers using the exact fractions method were modernized using the phase-stepping system for more accurate fringe fraction determination [6][7] while others are designed as systems with no wringing on the base plate [8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine global phase correction using the stack method, a GBI 300 interferometer with laser light at 633 nm and 543 nm, manufactured by Hexagon (NPL-Brown & Sharp, see figure 5) and a Kösters interferometer with a cadmium lamp emitting light at 468, 480, 509 and 644 nm wavelengths (figure 6), were used. Both the GBI 300 interferometer and the modernized Kösters interferometer [13] use the temporal phase shifting method for fringe pattern analysis.…”
Section: Instruments Used In the Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the automatic or semi-automatic gauge block interferometers described in the literature use a phase stepping method to determine the fringe fraction [6][7][8]. These authors give standard uncertainties in fringe fraction determination ranging from 0.02 to 0.004 of a fringe.…”
Section: Automating Fringe Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%