2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.449596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Spatial exemplars and metrics for characterizing image compression transform error</title>

Abstract: The efficient transmission and storage of digital imagery increasingly requires compression to maintain effective channel bandwidth and device capacity. Unfortunately, in applications where high compression ratios are required, iossy compression transforms tend to produce a wide variety of artifacts in decompressed images. Image quality measures (IQMs) have been published that detect global changes in image configuration resulting from the compression or decompression process. Examples include statistical and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the remaining three cases, the compression ratio for JPEG ranged as high as 32:1 while maintaining MSE 40 percent full scale. This behavior is expected, as discussed in our previous research [2,11,25,27 Figure 3. Sample exemplars and rate-distortion test results: (a) targetfbackground exemplars taken from our research in surface and buried mine detection, and (b) rate-distortion data for JPEG and EBLAST applied to test exemplars.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In the remaining three cases, the compression ratio for JPEG ranged as high as 32:1 while maintaining MSE 40 percent full scale. This behavior is expected, as discussed in our previous research [2,11,25,27 Figure 3. Sample exemplars and rate-distortion test results: (a) targetfbackground exemplars taken from our research in surface and buried mine detection, and (b) rate-distortion data for JPEG and EBLAST applied to test exemplars.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Here, F could mathematically describe a filter that is designed to enhance regions of interest. The computation of F as a region enhancement algorithm A implemented on a sequential workstation H can yield different numerical results (and, possibly, different detection results) if A is based on wavelet technology versus spatial edge detection [7]. Differences in numerical results might also be obtained when A is computed on a SIMD-parallel array versus a pipelined digital signal processor.…”
Section: Theory Of Forward Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As such, the primary objective of this paper is to provide image processing engineers and algorithm designers with an overview of previous and existing technology that can serve as a foundation for enhancing the accuracy of existing image processing algorithms. Our secondary objective is to support the combination of bit accounting techniques with statistical methods for forward analysis that we have published previously [2][3][4]6,7], to form a basis for multi-level abstraction in future analysis implementations.…”
Section: Phenomenology and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in [31][32][33], the vast majority of error measures for image compression are based in one way or another on MSE, which does not necessarily describe subtleties such as feature orientation errors, or the effect of feature distortions on the syntactic or semantic perception of an object within the context of a scene. Compromises in the complexity/accuracy tradeoff have been reported in [25,34,35], where multispectral image properties are employed to yield a small residual color error and coarse motion information that is sufficiently accurate to satistfy application-specific constraints.…”
Section: Alternative Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%