2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.427999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Statistical inference methods for gene expression arrays</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw intensity values (computed via the "volume" principal measure in ArrayVision) were corrected on an individual basis using local background estimates (median intensity value of the pixels in four valley regions surrounding each spot, adjusted to the size of the spot), and duplicate background corrected intensities were averaged for each gene. These data were preprocessed and analyzed according to the methods of ArrayStat V.1.2 (Imaging Research) (16,17). Briefly, the data were log-transformed and centered within conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw intensity values (computed via the "volume" principal measure in ArrayVision) were corrected on an individual basis using local background estimates (median intensity value of the pixels in four valley regions surrounding each spot, adjusted to the size of the spot), and duplicate background corrected intensities were averaged for each gene. These data were preprocessed and analyzed according to the methods of ArrayStat V.1.2 (Imaging Research) (16,17). Briefly, the data were log-transformed and centered within conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitted spline was then used to predict standard errors from PPM values for all of the tests for differential expression as if the predicted values were estimates from two biological replicates (R Development Core Team 2005). Like a previous use of a spline fit (Nadon et al 2001) and similar procedures (Jain et al 2003) our use of the spline fit was based on the observation that standard error estimates are much more variable than mean estimates, especially when there are few biological replicates.…”
Section: Statistical Hypothesis Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Rocke et al [27] and Newton et al [13] have presented models of measurement error in microarrays that can explicitly take into account higher variance at lower expression levels. More general approaches to variance pooling have been implemented in a variety of ways, using loess-based curve fits [15], robust nonparametric spline fits [28] and sliding windows for calculating either local averages [26,29,30] or interquartile ranges [24]. These more reliable estimates of the standard deviation can be used directly to calculate Z-statistics, which are calculated according to the same formula as the standard t-statistic, but correspond to lower p-values [26,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%