2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.431079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Validation of brain segmentation and tissue classification algorithm for T1-weighted MR images</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few algorithms rely solely on image intensity, (Schnack 2001) because these approaches are overly sensitive to image artifacts such as radiofrequency inhomogeneity, B 0 inhomogeneity, and aliasing, and can not adequately account for overlapping intensity distributions across structures. Therefore, to improve segmentation accuracy, most tissue segmentation algorithms combine intensity information with other techniques, such as the use of a priori anatomic information (Chalana 2001; Van Leemput 1999) or edge information through deformable contours (Davatzikos 1995; Xu 1999; Zeng 1999). Intensity information is analyzed differently in each approach, including Gaussian mixture models (Ashburner 2005; Andersen 2002; Marroquin 2002; Zhang 2001), discriminant analysis (Amato 2003), k-nearest neighbor classification (Mohamed 1999), and fuzzy c-means clustering (Pham 1999; Suckling 1999; Ahmed 2002; Zhu 2003; Zhou 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few algorithms rely solely on image intensity, (Schnack 2001) because these approaches are overly sensitive to image artifacts such as radiofrequency inhomogeneity, B 0 inhomogeneity, and aliasing, and can not adequately account for overlapping intensity distributions across structures. Therefore, to improve segmentation accuracy, most tissue segmentation algorithms combine intensity information with other techniques, such as the use of a priori anatomic information (Chalana 2001; Van Leemput 1999) or edge information through deformable contours (Davatzikos 1995; Xu 1999; Zeng 1999). Intensity information is analyzed differently in each approach, including Gaussian mixture models (Ashburner 2005; Andersen 2002; Marroquin 2002; Zhang 2001), discriminant analysis (Amato 2003), k-nearest neighbor classification (Mohamed 1999), and fuzzy c-means clustering (Pham 1999; Suckling 1999; Ahmed 2002; Zhu 2003; Zhou 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also do further clustering to confirm these findings. All the silhouette values using the correlation metric are greater than 0.80, which means strong structures have been found (Chalana et al, 2001). The case with k = 6 has the highest possible mean of silhouette values (1.0000), and the numbers of voxels in the six clusters are 102, 86, 48, 58, 45 and 1.…”
Section: Data Analysis For the First Saccade Data Setmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To measure the changes over time in GM volumes, accurate segmentation methods must be used. A variety of different approaches to brain tissue segmentation has been described in the literature [2][3][4]. Few algorithms rely solely on image intensity, [2] because these approaches are overly sensitive to image artifacts such as radio frequency inhomogeneity, and aliasing, and cannot adequately account for overlapping intensity distributions across structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few algorithms rely solely on image intensity, [2] because these approaches are overly sensitive to image artifacts such as radio frequency inhomogeneity, and aliasing, and cannot adequately account for overlapping intensity distributions across structures. Therefore, to improve segmentation accuracy, most tissue segmentation algorithms combine intensity information with other techniques, such as the use of a priori anatomic information [3,4] or edge information through deformable contours. The use of multiple images has significant advantages over a single image because the different contrasts can be enhanced between tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%