2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.452956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Version 2 TOMS UV algorithm: problems and enhancements</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface albedo used by the OMI surface UV algorithm is a climatological one, and likely it was lower than the actual effective surface albedo at least during the validation campaign. Past studies have also revealed this underestimation of the surface UV provided by TOMS data (Kalliskota et al, 2000;Krotkov et al, 2001Krotkov et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Erythemal Dose Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface albedo used by the OMI surface UV algorithm is a climatological one, and likely it was lower than the actual effective surface albedo at least during the validation campaign. Past studies have also revealed this underestimation of the surface UV provided by TOMS data (Kalliskota et al, 2000;Krotkov et al, 2001Krotkov et al, , 2002.…”
Section: Erythemal Dose Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm used to estimate the UV radiation reaching the Earth's surface is similar to the algorithm used to retrieve UV from the TOMS data (Herman et al, 1999;Krotkov et al, 2002). This OMI surface UV algorithm is based on the use of a radiative transfer model using the OMI-derived total ozone and cloud information as input parameters for modelling.…”
Section: Omi Surface Uv Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the clear-sky irradiance is multiplied by a factor that accounts for the attenuation of UV radiation by clouds and nonabsorbing aerosols. The current algorithm (Krotkov et al, 1998(Krotkov et al, , 2001(Krotkov et al, , 2002 does not account for absorbing aerosols (e.g. organic carbon, smoke, and dust) or trace gases (e.g., NO 2 , SO 2 ), which are known to lead to systematic overestimation of the surface UV irradiance (Chubarova, 2004;Arola et al, 2009) and neglects the cirrus effect on UV radiation.…”
Section: Aura/omimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the last OMI UVB Algorithm Documents 60 and confirmed by several authors [61][62][63] , OMI underestimates the values of the irradiance when there is a snow cover, because of the climatological surface albedo used by the OMI surface UV algorithm, which leads to overestimation of cloudiness 61 .…”
Section: >Table1mentioning
confidence: 99%