2015
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/26/12/125010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luminance measurement for curved surface sources with an imaging luminance measurement device

Abstract: Due to the advantages of fast measurement speed, imaging luminance measurement devices (ILMDs) have become more and more popular in the recent years. However, even though an ILMD is corrected by flat field calibration, the measured results deviate from the real values when measuring curved surface sources. The deviation is larger in particular when the curvature of the source is smaller or when the source is unlike a Lambertian source. This paper shows how to obtain correction factors to increase the measureme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some recent publications have addressed a selection of specific problems that are related to the measurement of the electro-optical properties of non-planar displays and light sources. Yu et al [4] analyze the effect of defocusing (in the case of imaging LMDs) on measurement results and conclude that it is rather the directional variation of emission (or transmission) of the display under test and the geometry of the measurement setup that are causing increased uncertainties. The case that conoscopic instruments measure cylindrical displays behind a cover glass with the front focal plane being above the display is analyzed by Boher et al, [5] with respect to angular distortions.…”
Section: Non-planar Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some recent publications have addressed a selection of specific problems that are related to the measurement of the electro-optical properties of non-planar displays and light sources. Yu et al [4] analyze the effect of defocusing (in the case of imaging LMDs) on measurement results and conclude that it is rather the directional variation of emission (or transmission) of the display under test and the geometry of the measurement setup that are causing increased uncertainties. The case that conoscopic instruments measure cylindrical displays behind a cover glass with the front focal plane being above the display is analyzed by Boher et al, [5] with respect to angular distortions.…”
Section: Non-planar Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since imaging LMDs have been calibrated for the case of planar objects of measurement, the measurement of non-planar samples may introduce errors due to de-focusing. Analyses of this effect by Yu [4] identify the main sources of measurement uncertainty to be the directional variation of light emission and the geometrical details of the measurement setup.…”
Section: Measurement Of Lateral Uniformitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some recent publications have addressed a selection of specific problems that are related to the measurement of the electrooptical properties of non-planar displays and light sources. Yu et al [1] analyze the effect of defocusing of imaging LMDs on the measurement results and conclude that it is rather the directional variation of emission (or transmission) of the display under test and the geometry of the measurement setup that are causing increased uncertainties. The case that conoscopic instruments measure cylindrical displays behind a cover glass with the front focal plane being above the display is analyzed by Boher et al, [2] with respect to angular distortions.…”
Section: Non-planar Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since imaging LMDs have been calibrated for the case of planar objects of measurement, the measurement of non-planar samples may introduce errors due to de-focusing. Analysis of this effect by Yu [1] identify the main sources of measurement uncertainty to be the directional variation of light emission and the geometrical details of the measurement setup.…”
Section: Measurement Of Lateral Uniformitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%