2015
DOI: 10.1039/c4sc03161j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luminescent zinc(ii) and copper(i) complexes for high-performance solution-processed monochromic and white organic light-emitting devices

Abstract: High performance orange (EQE up to 15.64%) and white (EQE up to 6.88%) solution processed OLEDs fabricated solely with emitters of non-platinum group metals were reported. The white device has CIE coordinates of (0.42, 0.44) and CRI of 81.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum power efficiencies (PEs) of the WOLEDs were also measured to be 0.30, 0.25, and 0.13 lm/W for devices A, B, and C, respectively. Even though these LE and PE values are low in comparison to those reported for phosphoresce and TADF‐based WOLEDs,, they are comparable with the best values reported in the literature for thermally‐processed fluorescent zinc(II)‐based WOLEDs (0.12 to 2.1 cd/A for LE and 0.038 to 1.17 lm/W for PE) . It is important to note that the gradual decrease in the device efficiency of devices B and C compared with device A is due to the fact that, as mentioned above, the turn‐on voltages of these devices increase by increasing the doping concentration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum power efficiencies (PEs) of the WOLEDs were also measured to be 0.30, 0.25, and 0.13 lm/W for devices A, B, and C, respectively. Even though these LE and PE values are low in comparison to those reported for phosphoresce and TADF‐based WOLEDs,, they are comparable with the best values reported in the literature for thermally‐processed fluorescent zinc(II)‐based WOLEDs (0.12 to 2.1 cd/A for LE and 0.038 to 1.17 lm/W for PE) . It is important to note that the gradual decrease in the device efficiency of devices B and C compared with device A is due to the fact that, as mentioned above, the turn‐on voltages of these devices increase by increasing the doping concentration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Solution‐processing is technically less complicated, inexpensive, and therefore highly attractive for large‐area manufacturing purposes . However, to date, reports on solution‐processed zinc(II) complex‐based OLEDs are scarce . Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no report on solution‐processed WOLEDs based on zinc(II) complexes with AIE behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge‐neutral luminescent Cu I complexes containing 7,8‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐7,8‐dicarba‐ nido ‐undecaborate (dppnc) ligands have been widely studied . Sterically bulky carborane‐containing ligands show a unique electronic effect and thermal stability, and can be used to tune the photoluminescent properties, intermolecular interactions, concentration quenching behavior and hydrophilicity of luminescent metal complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The emission energy of 5 can be tuned by using host materials with different band‐gaps. By using a higher band‐gap material PYD2 (2,6‐dicarbazolo‐1,5‐pyridine), to replace PVK:OXD‐7 as the host, the emission peak maximum of the device with 5 further blue‐shifts to 486 nm with CIE coordinates of (0.21, 0.42) (Figure S17). The maximum EQE of this device is 15.7 % which slightly decreased to 14.4 % at 1000 cd m −2 (Figure S18).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%