2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.21.102801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Luminosity scans for beam diagnostics

Abstract: A new type of fast luminosity separation scans ("Emittance Scans") was introduced at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in 2015. The scans were performed systematically in every fill with full-intensity beams in physics production conditions at the Interaction Point (IP) of the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment. They provide both transverse emittance and closed orbit measurements at a bunch-by-bunch level. The precise measurement of beam-beam closed orbit differences allowed a direct, quantitative obser… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be attributed to the different loss mechanisms, i.e., is related to the position in the batch and, therefore, to the different collision patterns and different number of long-range beam-beam (LRBB) encounters in the highluminosity insertions (IR1 and IR5). For the same case, no clear correlation was found for the computed diffusion coefficient with the LRBB orbits shifts [31,32] nor with the different bunch collision classes (PACMAN [33]). This is not completely unexpected, as recent analyses of the typical lifetimes of the various bunches did not reveal any hint of a LRBB pattern during long periods without changes of the crossing angle or β Ã [34].…”
Section: Bunch-by-bunch Diffusion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to the different loss mechanisms, i.e., is related to the position in the batch and, therefore, to the different collision patterns and different number of long-range beam-beam (LRBB) encounters in the highluminosity insertions (IR1 and IR5). For the same case, no clear correlation was found for the computed diffusion coefficient with the LRBB orbits shifts [31,32] nor with the different bunch collision classes (PACMAN [33]). This is not completely unexpected, as recent analyses of the typical lifetimes of the various bunches did not reveal any hint of a LRBB pattern during long periods without changes of the crossing angle or β Ã [34].…”
Section: Bunch-by-bunch Diffusion Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig.5, the evolution of the first 10-12 bunches in the train is different from the other bunches, especially noticeable in X. Understanding the measured emittance evolution is also of high importance for benchmarking the simulation code (TRAIN) for the beam evolution prediction [7] and improving the luminosity model [8].…”
Section: Pos(eps-hep2019)193mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that CMS online luminometers are equipped with 40 MHz readout systems, without which it would not be possible to derive the per bunch crossing corrections listed above. From 2017 onwards CMS performed emittance scans in almost every physics fill, these are similar to vdM scans but of shorter duration and extent [5,6]. Emittance scans are not giving a precise enough absolute luminosity calibration, but are powerful for studying bunch effects, to monitor the stability and to measure the nonlinearity of the luminometers.…”
Section: Pos(eps-hep2019)194mentioning
confidence: 99%