2014
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lunar bulk chemical composition: a post-Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory reassessment

Abstract: New estimates of the thickness of the lunar highlands crust based on data from the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory mission, allow us to reassess the abundances of refractory elements in the Moon. Previous estimates of the Moon fall into two distinct groups: earthlike and a 50% enrichment in the Moon compared with the Earth. Revised crustal thicknesses and compositional information from remote sensing and lunar samples indicate that the crust contributes 1.13–1.85 wt% Al 2 O … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of the above isotopic arguments, we simply posit that the abundances of SiO 2 , TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , FeO, MnO, MgO and CaO are the same on the Earth and Moon. This supposition is supported by the more extensive petrologic arguments of Warren (2005), Ringwood (1992) and Taylor and Wieczorek (2014) who reached the same conclusion for major elements and 27 refractory lithophile elements (FeO excepted); in our case, we assume a terrestrial FeO content, but admit that present constraints on the density of the lunar mantle and size of the lunar core would permit a slightly higher FeO and lower corresponding Mg# (Warren and Dauphas, 2014). In the same way, we also assume that the refractory lithophile elements are present at terrestrial levels in the Moon, for elements with 50% condensation temperatures >1300 K. Our BSM composition is given in Table 3 and described in detail in the Supplementary Material, and BSM/BSE ratios are shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Volatile Element Depletion Of the Moonsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of the above isotopic arguments, we simply posit that the abundances of SiO 2 , TiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , FeO, MnO, MgO and CaO are the same on the Earth and Moon. This supposition is supported by the more extensive petrologic arguments of Warren (2005), Ringwood (1992) and Taylor and Wieczorek (2014) who reached the same conclusion for major elements and 27 refractory lithophile elements (FeO excepted); in our case, we assume a terrestrial FeO content, but admit that present constraints on the density of the lunar mantle and size of the lunar core would permit a slightly higher FeO and lower corresponding Mg# (Warren and Dauphas, 2014). In the same way, we also assume that the refractory lithophile elements are present at terrestrial levels in the Moon, for elements with 50% condensation temperatures >1300 K. Our BSM composition is given in Table 3 and described in detail in the Supplementary Material, and BSM/BSE ratios are shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Volatile Element Depletion Of the Moonsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…For these two systems, volatile depletion works in opposite directions, resulting in low 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios like those observed in lunar anorthosites (Carlson and Lugmair, 1988), while volatile depletion works to increase the U/Pb ratio of mantle sources and results in high ratios of 207 Pb/ 204 Pb and 206 Pb/ 204 Pb as observed in the interiors of volcanic glass beads (Tera and Wasserburg, 1976). The point to be made here is that recent high-precision studies on well-dated lunar rocks, where multiple isotope systems give concordant ages, has revealed the isotopic evolution of initial Sr and Pb isotope ratios among lunar mantle sources at different ages, and these isotopic evolutions are often consistent with Rb/Sr and U/Pb ratios that begin to approach terrestrial ratios.…”
Section: The Volatile Element Depletion Of the Moonmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nonetheless, we have not attempted to use lunar crust composition as a basis for comparison, because it is heterogeneous and regionally variable (e.g., Taylor 2009, Taylor & Wieczorek 2014; thus, limiting the comparison to crustal compositions would not be practical. Instead we have used models of the bulk Moon (Table 3).…”
Section: The Moonmentioning
confidence: 99%