2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11857-007-0004-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lundberg’s risk process with tax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
98
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which is an extension of the so-called tax identity 5) first established by Albrecher and Hipp (2007). Ruin probabilities and other ruinrelated quantities (e.g.…”
Section: Du (T) = C (U (T)) 1 − γ U (T) I U (T) = U (T) Dt − Ds(t) Tmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which is an extension of the so-called tax identity 5) first established by Albrecher and Hipp (2007). Ruin probabilities and other ruinrelated quantities (e.g.…”
Section: Du (T) = C (U (T)) 1 − γ U (T) I U (T) = U (T) Dt − Ds(t) Tmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this paper, the compound Poisson risk model modified by tax payments under a loss-carry forward tax system is studied. Such a tax model was first proposed by Albrecher and Hipp (2007) in the context of a constant tax rate and was later generalized by Albrecher et al (2009) to a surplus-dependent tax rate. Under this taxation system, it is assumed that, whenever the surplus process {U (t)} t≥0 is at its running maximum U (t) = sup 0≤s≤t U (s) at a given time t ≥ 0, a fraction γ (U (t)) of the premium income is paid as tax and as a result, the surplus process grows at the reduced rate c(U (t)) [1 − γ (U (t))].…”
Section: Du(t) = C(u(t)) Dt − Ds(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are no criteria known under which such a payment strategy is optimal, it leads to surprisingly simple identities between the survival probability with and without those payments and has another natural interpretation in terms of tax payments on profits of the insurance business (cf. Albrecher & Hipp [6] and Albrecher et al [1,8]). …”
Section: Some Particular Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is an extension of the so-called tax identity (see [1], [2] and [3]). Even though this result was not explicitely stated in [6], one clearly sees that this is a direct consequence of Equation (3).…”
Section: (S(t)) Ds(t)mentioning
confidence: 97%