2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13665-011-0004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung cancer chemoprevention: current status and future directions

Abstract: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the world. In the United States, lung cancer causes more death per annum than colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers combined. While smoking prevention and cessation are essential strategies against lung cancer, they are often ineffective, and former smokers remain at lower, yet persistent risks. The magnitude of the tobacco epidemic and burden of lung cancer will continue to escalate globally, underscoring the importance of advancing chemoprevention resear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite advancements in anticancer treatments, the 5-year survival for lung cancer remains dismal (32). The lack of effective therapy provides the impetus to search for alternative, safe, and efficacious agents for lung cancer chemoprevention, to impede the driving force of cancerization, and prevent lung cancer development in at-risk individuals (34). The encouraging findings from phase IIb lung cancer chemoprevention trials with celecoxib and iloprost have engendered discussions on developing a study using a combination of the two agents, so that iloprost may negate the increased cardiovascular risk associated with pharmaceutical COX-2 inhibitors, while exerting synergistic antineoplastic effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advancements in anticancer treatments, the 5-year survival for lung cancer remains dismal (32). The lack of effective therapy provides the impetus to search for alternative, safe, and efficacious agents for lung cancer chemoprevention, to impede the driving force of cancerization, and prevent lung cancer development in at-risk individuals (34). The encouraging findings from phase IIb lung cancer chemoprevention trials with celecoxib and iloprost have engendered discussions on developing a study using a combination of the two agents, so that iloprost may negate the increased cardiovascular risk associated with pharmaceutical COX-2 inhibitors, while exerting synergistic antineoplastic effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant advancements in anticancer treatments, the 5-year survival rate for lung cancer remains dismal. The lack of effective therapy provides the impetus to search for alternative, safe, and efficacious agents for lung cancer chemoprevention, to impede the driving forces of cancerization, and prevent the development of lung cancer in at-risk individuals (20). Whereas chemopreventive approaches have been proven successful for various cancers such as breast and colon cancer (21,22), successes in phase III lung cancer chemoprevention trials have remained elusive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite advancements in anti-cancer treatment, the 5-year survival for lung cancer remains dismal [30][31][32]. The lack of effective therapy provides the impetus to search for alternative, safe and efficacious agents for lung cancer chemoprevention, to impede the driving force of cancerization, and prevent lung cancer development in at-risk individuals [33]. In this study, we demonstrate novel GSE mediated anti-neoplastic mechanisms involving modulations of oncomirs and the efficacy of leucoselect phytosome against lung cancer; modulation of these mechanisms may also be useful as SEBM in future clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%