2012 11th International Conference on Information Science, Signal Processing and Their Applications (ISSPA) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/isspa.2012.6310676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung nodule classification in frequency domain using support vector machines

Abstract: In this paper a computational alternative to classify lung nodules inside CT thorax images in the frequency domain is presented. After image acquisition, a region of interest is manually selected. Then, the spectrums of the two dimensional Discrete Cosine Transform (2D-DCT) and the two dimensional Fast Fourier Transform (2D-FFT) were calculated. Later, two statistical texture features were extracted from the histogram computed from the spectrum of each CT image. Finally, a support vector machine with a radial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Computational classifier Santos et al [4], Wang et al [25], Choi and Choi [24], Riccardi et al [30], Liu et al [31], Ozekes and Osman [37], Yang, Periaswamy and Wu [39] and Orozco et al [94] Support vector machines (SVM) El-Baz et al [22] Bayesian supervised Cascio et al [26], Ashwin et al [72], Lin et al [95] and Bellotti et al [96] Artificial neural networks (ANN)…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational classifier Santos et al [4], Wang et al [25], Choi and Choi [24], Riccardi et al [30], Liu et al [31], Ozekes and Osman [37], Yang, Periaswamy and Wu [39] and Orozco et al [94] Support vector machines (SVM) El-Baz et al [22] Bayesian supervised Cascio et al [26], Ashwin et al [72], Lin et al [95] and Bellotti et al [96] Artificial neural networks (ANN)…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the results were compared with some of the latest similar researches on the subject as shown in Table 1 . In this table, the highest sensitivity is 96.15 in,[ 29 ] which is better than 90.1 of our algorithm, but our specificity is 92.8, better than 52.17 in. [ 29 ] This result shows that, compared with existing algorithms, our method performs at a similar or better level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification in frequency domain using SVM classifier was performed by [43] [66]. [42] used SVM and weighted modifies Mahalanobis distance measure to nodule classification.…”
Section: Svm Based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%