1999
DOI: 10.1093/bja/83.6.829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lung protective ventilatory strategies—will these prevail in the next millennium?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amato et al (1998) showed a reduction in mortality from 71 to 38% in patients (nˆ53) receiving protective ventilation (P < 0.001). Protective ventilation consisted of tidal volumes less than 6 mL=kg, and PEEP above the lower in¯ection point on the static pressure±volume curve (Keogh and Bateman, 1999;Gattinoni et al, 1995a). A driving pressure less than 20 cmH 2 O above PEEP was aimed for, with preferential use of pressure-limited ventilation modes.…”
Section: Low Tidal Volume Ventilation In Acute Lung Injury = Acute Respiratory Distress Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amato et al (1998) showed a reduction in mortality from 71 to 38% in patients (nˆ53) receiving protective ventilation (P < 0.001). Protective ventilation consisted of tidal volumes less than 6 mL=kg, and PEEP above the lower in¯ection point on the static pressure±volume curve (Keogh and Bateman, 1999;Gattinoni et al, 1995a). A driving pressure less than 20 cmH 2 O above PEEP was aimed for, with preferential use of pressure-limited ventilation modes.…”
Section: Low Tidal Volume Ventilation In Acute Lung Injury = Acute Respiratory Distress Syndromementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower inflection point of this compliance curve is theoretically the pressure at which less stable lung units collapse and re-open. It has been suggested that PEEP should be set above this pressure and this results in levels of PEEP somewhat higher than traditionally used (Keogh et al, 1999;. Several studies have examined the use of protective ventilation strategies in ARDS patients with conflicting results (Amato et al, 1998;Brochard et al, 1998;Stewart et al, 1998), although the largest study so far does provide evidence of benefit.…”
Section: Mechanical Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so called 'lung protective ventilation strategies' are being widely investigated and applied worldwide, also influencing current clinical practice [4]. Despite the indicated trends of the researches, the evidence of efficacy or outcome benefits of these techniques is still limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%