2013
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.049593-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lysinibacillus contaminans sp. nov., isolated from surface water

Abstract: A Gram-positive-staining, aerobic, endospore-forming bacterium, isolated as a contamination from an enrichment of enteric bacteria from surface water, was studied using a polyphasic taxonomic approach. 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity comparisons revealed that strain FSt3AT was grouped in the genus Lysinibacillus, most closely related to Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus XDB9 T (98.1 %), Lysinibacillus parviboronicapiens BAM-582 T and Lysinibacillus sphaericus DSM 28 T (both 98.0 %). The 16S rRNA gene sequence sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the time of writing, the genus Lysinibacillus consisted of eighteen species with validly published names (http://www.bacterio.net/lysinibacillus.html) with Lysinibacillus boronitolerans as the type species. Members of this genus have been isolated from environments such as different types of soil (Ahmed et al , 2007; Miwa et al , 2009; Liu et al , 2013), surface water (Kämpfer et al , 2013), fermented soybean food (Kim et al , 2013), and inner tissues of plants and human beings (Glazunova et al , 2006; Duan et al , 2013). In this study, during an investigation of the diversity of bacterial population of typical sandy loam soil under long-term fertilization, an endospore-forming, Gram-staining-positive bacterium, strain OMN17 T , was isolated and found to have morphological properties consistent with the genus Lysinibacillus .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of writing, the genus Lysinibacillus consisted of eighteen species with validly published names (http://www.bacterio.net/lysinibacillus.html) with Lysinibacillus boronitolerans as the type species. Members of this genus have been isolated from environments such as different types of soil (Ahmed et al , 2007; Miwa et al , 2009; Liu et al , 2013), surface water (Kämpfer et al , 2013), fermented soybean food (Kim et al , 2013), and inner tissues of plants and human beings (Glazunova et al , 2006; Duan et al , 2013). In this study, during an investigation of the diversity of bacterial population of typical sandy loam soil under long-term fertilization, an endospore-forming, Gram-staining-positive bacterium, strain OMN17 T , was isolated and found to have morphological properties consistent with the genus Lysinibacillus .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fatty acid composition of strain SYSU K30002 T varied when compared with L. endophyticus CGMCC 1.15291 T and L. sinduriensis KCTC 13296 T , especially the low amounts of anteiso-C 15 : 0 and anteiso-C 17 : 0 in SYSU K30002 T ( Table 2). Although anteiso-C 15 : 0 was reported as a major fatty acid constituent in most members of the genus Lysinibacillus [3,4] but in L.sphaericus its portion was < 5% [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The genus Lysinibacillus belongs to the family Bacillaceae of the phylum Firmicutes, and was proposed by Ahmed et al [1]. At the time of writing, the genus consisted of 26 recognized species [2] reported from a wide range of environments, such as plants [3], fermented food [4], different soil types [5,6] and contaminant from surface water [7]. During our microbial diversity analysis of cave soil samples in Xingyi county, China, many novel candidate bacteria were isolated, and reported [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some species of the genus Lysinibacillus do not contain phosphatidylethanolamine, but unidentified glycolipids are present as major polar lipids (Jung et al , 2012). To date, there are 21 species (with validly/effectively published names) in the genus Lysinibacillus , with Lysinibacillus varians (Zhu et al , 2014), L. halotolerans (Kong et al , 2014), L. composti (Hayat et al , 2014), ‘ L. fluoroglycofenilyticus ’ (Cheng et al , 2015), L. tabacifolii (Duan et al , 2013), L. chungkukjangi (Kim et al , 2013a), L. contaminans (Kämpfer et al , 2013), ‘ L. jejuensis ’ (Kim et al , 2013b) and L. manganicus (Liu et al , 2013) being recent additions. The names ‘ L. jejuensis ’ and ‘ L. fluoroglycofenilyticus ’ have not yet been validly published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%