2005
DOI: 10.1186/1477-3163-4-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: As part of a larger literature study on transgenic animals in mutagenicity testing, test results from the transgenic mutagenicity assays (lacI model; commercially available as the Big Blue® mouse, and the lacZ model; commercially available as the Muta™Mouse), were compared with the results on the same substances in the more traditional mouse bone marrow micronucleus test. 39 substances were found which had been tested in the micronucleus assay and in the above transgenic mouse systems. Although, the transgenic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Southern blot data suggests that copy number is about the same for all strains. More recently, the copy number for Muta™Mouse has been described as 40 per haploid genome, without reference to how this copy version was derived ( 38 , 39 ). This amount slightly exceeds the averaged estimates by slot blot hybridisation for a cell line (FE1) derived from one of our animals ( 7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the Southern blot data suggests that copy number is about the same for all strains. More recently, the copy number for Muta™Mouse has been described as 40 per haploid genome, without reference to how this copy version was derived ( 38 , 39 ). This amount slightly exceeds the averaged estimates by slot blot hybridisation for a cell line (FE1) derived from one of our animals ( 7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these models have yet to be formally accepted into the regulatory testing framework, the US Food and Drug Administration have suggested how several of these models could be used in this context. Similarly, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is considering the benefits of using the lacI BigBlue TM mouse and LacZ Muta®mouse transgenic models for mutagenicity testing (Wahnschaffe et al 2005). The mutagenic target of Muta®mouse is a bacterial LacZ gene, and the target of Big Blue is the LacI repressor gene.…”
Section: Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example of how the use of GM mice can have a positive impact on animal welfare is the use of reporter mice for mutagenicity (or genotoxicity) testing. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is considering the benefits of using the LacI BigBlue® mouse and LacZ Muta™mouse transgenic models for mutagenicity testing (81). The mutagenic target of Muta™mouse is a bacterial LacZ gene, and the target of Big Blue is the LacI repressor gene.…”
Section: Mutagenicity Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of such models for mutagenicity testing has the potential to provide a means to screen mutagens which may have escaped detection in simpler assays, such as the mouse spot test and mouse bone-marrow micronucleus test, since it is possible to monitor the ability of mutagens to trigger mutations in more than one type of tissue, without using large numbers of animals (81,82). Indeed, despite differences between the endpoints, tests based on the use of these transgenic models and the mouse spot test or in vivo micronucleus test have similar predictabilities.…”
Section: Mutagenicity Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%