“…As I have previously noted elsewhere, the exchange that followed Naipaul’s paper is now something of a legend in the history of Caribbean criticism, and the various debates, snipes, and exchanges that the event staged involved, in one capacity or another, most of the “big” names of that time (Donnell, 2006). The critic Kenneth Ramchand accused Brathwaite of “folking up” the criticism during the conference itself but even his damning response seemed rather tepid compared to that of Eric Roach (also Trinidadian) who published his Eurocentric riposte in the Trinidad Guardian : “We have been given the European languages and forms of culture — culture in the traditional, aesthetic sense, meaning the best that has been thought, said and done […] Are we going to tie the drum of Africa to our tails and bay like mad dogs at the Nordic world to which our geography and history tie us?” (Roach, 1971; qtd in Breiner, 1993: 2). Accounts even include the absent Walcott who was apparently warned to stay away due to “CULTURAL GORILLAS” (Brathwaite, 1994: 322).…”