Macaulay's Minute Revisited: Colonial Language Policy in Nineteenth-century India

Abstract

This paper examines a crucial episode in the history of language policy in British colonial education: the Orientalist-Anglicist controversy of the 1830s over the content and medium of government education in India. The bitter dispute over colonial language-in-education policy during this period raised fundamental questions about the roles and status of the English language and the Indian vernacular and classical languages in the diffusion of Western knowledge and ideas on the subcontinent. At the heart of many accounts of the controversy, not least those of a polemical nature, is Thomas Babington Macaulay's famous Minute of 1835, which advocated the creation of a class of anglicised Indians who would serve as cultural intermediariesbetween the British and their Indian subjects. This paper reassesses Macaulay's influence on British language policy in 19th century India. It begins by examining the background to the Orientalist-Anglicist dispute in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, and then moves on to analyse the content and purpose of the Minute. The second part examines the short-term and long-term consequences of Macaulay's scheme in India and in other British colonial contexts.

Language policy and language planning in Cyprus

“…10. See Evans (2002) for an analysis of the impact of parsimony concerns on colonial education and language policy. 11.…”

The Role of Educational Institutions in Islamization, Social Reformation and National Integration in Pakistan

“…But, later on, they started introducing and implementing their educational policy. The aim of their educational policy was not educating the people but controlling their minds for their own interest and intentions of expanding and strengthening the frontiers of their dominance 17 . Consequently, English language was introduced as a compulsory medium of instruction by replacing Persian.…”

Philology and Global English Studies

“…Persistent attempts at filling the gaps in Viswanathan's account while subscribing to its ideological spirit delved into the "generating principles" of policy documents. Various reconsiderations of Thomas Babington Macaulay's much-discussed 1835 Minute on Education, which stated the Anglicist position most explicitly, have appeared at regular intervals since (Phillipson, 1992;Ghosh, 1995;Evans, 2002). Prem Poddar (2002) followed Viswanathan's methodology in analyzing the "generating principles" of post-independence Indian education policy in relation to English Studies.…”