2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning approaches for classifying lunar soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar (global-scale) machine-learning-driven searches were previously performed by Bickel et al (2020a) and Bickel et al (2022). In addition to mapping applications, earlier work used machine learning for global-scale analyses of the physical surface properties of the Moon and asteroids, such as performed by Cambioni et al (2019), Kodikara & McHenry (2020), and Moseley et al (2020). Our neural network was trained on images that cover the full range of known block degradation states, including boulders with single fracture, heavily fractured boulders, as well as catastrophically shattered boulders, specifically excluding large, intact boulders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similar (global-scale) machine-learning-driven searches were previously performed by Bickel et al (2020a) and Bickel et al (2022). In addition to mapping applications, earlier work used machine learning for global-scale analyses of the physical surface properties of the Moon and asteroids, such as performed by Cambioni et al (2019), Kodikara & McHenry (2020), and Moseley et al (2020). Our neural network was trained on images that cover the full range of known block degradation states, including boulders with single fracture, heavily fractured boulders, as well as catastrophically shattered boulders, specifically excluding large, intact boulders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Machine learning methods are increasingly employed to assist in the analysis of remote sensing data for planetary science and exploration. Examples include the classification of lunar soils using reflectance spectra (Kodikara and McHenry, 2020), the classification of terrain types in Mars orbital images to inform landing site selection (Ono et al, 2016;Barrett et al, 2022), the classification of rover and orbital images to enable content-based search of the Planetary Data System image archives (Wagstaff et al, 2018(Wagstaff et al, , 2021 or map features such as volcanic rootless cones and transverse aeolian ridges (Palafox et al, 2017) and rockfalls on Mars (Bickel et al, 2020b) and the Moon (Bickel et al, 2020a), and the identification of novel features in rover images to accelerate discovery (Kerner et al, 2020). 2021) adapted a CNN that was trained on large craters in THEMIS data to apply to smaller craters in CTX images and used it to determine crater populations and infer the age of the ejecta blankets of ten large craters on Mars.…”
Section: Methods: Detecting Fresh Impacts With Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of deep learning and its evolution can be found in LeCun et al (2015) and Schmidhuber (2015), respectively. Kodikara and McHenry (2020) examined the ability of ML algorithms, adopting 9 ML algorithms representing linear, non-linear, classification trees, and rule-based models, to determine the physical and mineralogical properties of lunar soil using the reflectance spectra of lunar soils.…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature selection is an effective way to identify the important features in a dataset and discard others as irrelevant and redundant. Irrelevant and redundant features in the training dataset can result in highly unstable models and poor performance (e.g., Kodikara and McHenry, 2020).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%