2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-018-9613-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning approaches for non-intrusive load monitoring: from qualitative to quantitative comparation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
85
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It is common practise that researchers evaluate their proposed NILM solutions on different datasets, with different criteria, and with the help of different metrics. From this follows that a direct comparison between two proposed algorithms is virtually impossible (Nalmpantis & Vrakas, 2018). To assess the validity of their proposed NILM approach, many researchers utilise the Zeifman requirements (Zeifman, 2012).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is common practise that researchers evaluate their proposed NILM solutions on different datasets, with different criteria, and with the help of different metrics. From this follows that a direct comparison between two proposed algorithms is virtually impossible (Nalmpantis & Vrakas, 2018). To assess the validity of their proposed NILM approach, many researchers utilise the Zeifman requirements (Zeifman, 2012).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comparison of two candidate algorithms is possible or not (Nalmpantis & Vrakas, 2018). A requirements catalogue similar to the Zeifman requirements (Zeifman, 2012), a list of requirements that describe what characteristics a NILM algorithm should have, is likely to ease objective comparisons by providing clear guidelines how meaningful comparisons of several NILM approaches can be drawn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of the need for technologies promoting low-carbon emissions and the advances in machine learning and statistical techniques is generating a substantial amount of energy disaggregation review papers such as Nalmpantis and Vrakas (2018), Esa, Abdullah, and Hassan (2016), Abubakar, Khalid, Mustafa, Shareef, and Mustapha (2016), Wong, Ahmet Sekercioglu, Drummond, and Wong (2013), Butner, Reid, Hoffman, Sullivan, and Blanchard (2013), Makonin (2012), Zoha, Gluhak, Imran, and Rajasegarar (2012), Jiang, Li, Luo, Jin, and West (2011), and Zeifman and Roth (2011). In general NILM approaches are grouped into two categories: (a) event-based approaches and (b) event-less approaches (Bergés & Kolter, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the years, a great number of algorithms have been proposed to solve the problem of energy disaggregation [3,4]. These algorithms are categorized into either event-based or event-less, based on the disaggregation approach [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%