2020 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics (AQTR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/aqtr49680.2020.9130026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning-Assisted Detection of Action Potentials in Extracellular Multi-Unit Recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, when the noise level reached 0.5, the accuracy became 85.6%. As can be seen from table (2), the spike1 (sp1) and spike2 (sp2) were less affected when the noise levels became higher. On the other hand, the recall for the SP1=100% and SP2=84.6 % and SP3 decreased to reach 69.7%.…”
Section: A Template Matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…For instance, when the noise level reached 0.5, the accuracy became 85.6%. As can be seen from table (2), the spike1 (sp1) and spike2 (sp2) were less affected when the noise levels became higher. On the other hand, the recall for the SP1=100% and SP2=84.6 % and SP3 decreased to reach 69.7%.…”
Section: A Template Matching Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The multi-unit activity (MUA) was obtained by band-pass filtering the extracellular recorded data using a bidirectional Butterworth IIR filter, order 3 with cut-off frequencies between 300 Hz and 7 kHz. Subsequently, an amplitude threshold was calculated based on the standard deviation (SD) of the filtered signal and set at a factor of the SD [typically between 3 and 5 ( Bârzan et al, 2020 )]. All threshold crossings were identified as spikes and subsequently used as input for the feature extraction algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the generality of the proposed method, the detection is evaluated by measuring the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (TPR) and the false-alarm rate (FAR), given by Equations ( 1)- (3).…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) or Brain Silicon Interfaces (BSIs) enable the communication between the brain and the outside environment by conveying signals acquired from the brain to control actuators such as computers or robotic arms, with potential to restore motor function in individuals with disabilities [1,2]. Advances in microelectronics made it possible to use high-density microelectrode arrays (MEAs) which provide measurements of high accuracy and, consequently, the possibility to simultaneously record large neuronal populations at high spatiotemporal resolution with a good signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [3]. The newer implantable neural interfaces can record up to 1000 s channels, however such a large number of channels poses major challenges for the communication link, for both wired and wireless systems [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%