No abstract

Spike sorting is the process of grouping spikes of distinct neurons into their respective clusters. Most frequently, this grouping is performed by relying on the similarity of features extracted from spike shapes. In spite of recent developments, current methods have yet to achieve satisfactory performance and many investigators favour sorting manually, even though it is an intensive undertaking that requires prolonged allotments of time. To automate the process, a diverse array of machine learning techniques has been applied. The performance of these techniques depends however critically on the feature extraction step. Here, we propose deep learning using autoencoders as a feature extraction method and evaluate extensively the performance of multiple designs. The models presented are evaluated on publicly available synthetic and real “in vivo” datasets, with various numbers of clusters. The proposed methods indicate a higher performance for the process of spike sorting when compared to other state-of-the-art techniques.

No abstract

Brain oscillations are thought to subserve important functions by organizing the dynamical landscape of neural circuits. The expression of such oscillations in neural signals is usually evaluated using time-frequency representations (TFR), which resolve oscillatory processes in both time and frequency. While a vast number of methods exist to compute TFRs, there is often no objective criterion to decide which one is better. In feature-rich data, such as that recorded from the brain, sources of noise and unrelated processes abound and contaminate results. The impact of these distractor sources is especially problematic, such that TFRs that are more robust to contaminants are expected to provide more useful representations. In addition, the minutiae of the techniques themselves impart better or worse time and frequency resolutions, which also influence the usefulness of the TFRs. Here, we introduce a methodology to evaluate the “quality” of TFRs of neural signals by quantifying how much information they retain about the experimental condition during visual stimulation and recognition tasks, in mice and humans, respectively. We used machine learning to discriminate between various experimental conditions based on TFRs computed with different methods. We found that various methods provide more or less informative TFRs depending on the characteristics of the data. In general, however, more advanced techniques, such as the superlet transform, seem to provide better results for complex time-frequency landscapes, such as those extracted from electroencephalography signals. Finally, we introduce a method based on feature perturbation that is able to quantify how much time-frequency components contribute to the correct discrimination among experimental conditions. The methodology introduced in the present study may be extended to other analyses of neural data, enabling the discovery of data features that are modulated by the experimental manipulation.