2020
DOI: 10.1167/jov.20.9.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning-based classification of viewing behavior using a wide range of statistical oculomotor features

Abstract: Since the seminal work of Yarbus, multiple studies have demonstrated the influence of task-set on oculomotor behavior and the current cognitive state. In more recent years, this field of research has expanded by evaluating the costs of abruptly switching between such different tasks. At the same time, the field of classifying oculomotor behavior has been moving toward more advanced, data-driven methods of decoding data. For the current study, we used a large dataset compiled over multiple experiments and imple… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Better classification performances relative to previous investigations are even more striking given that we have run analyses multiple times, leading to presumable conservative results. As Bednarik et al (2012), Kootstra et al (2020), andJang et al (2014) demonstrate, the inclusion of further gaze characteristics can substantially improve classification in related settings, which should be addressed in an investigation that allows free gaze movements, but controls for effects such as foreshortening errors affecting pupil size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Better classification performances relative to previous investigations are even more striking given that we have run analyses multiple times, leading to presumable conservative results. As Bednarik et al (2012), Kootstra et al (2020), andJang et al (2014) demonstrate, the inclusion of further gaze characteristics can substantially improve classification in related settings, which should be addressed in an investigation that allows free gaze movements, but controls for effects such as foreshortening errors affecting pupil size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addressing the question whether pupil dilation may decode decisions on a single trial level, a few investigations using support vector machine classifiers (SVMs) have been put forward over the past years (Bednarik et al, 2012;Jangraw, Wang, Lance, Chang, & Sajda, 2014;Medathati et al, 2020). Although several articles have found random forest classifiers to be particularly useful for predictions also based on pupil dilation (Kootstra et al, 2020;Pasquali et al, 2020), no prior work has focused on predicting intentions only using pupil size. Jangraw et al (2014) used electroencephalography and ocular parameters to infer objects that were of subjective interest to users in a virtual reality environment and found both to be predictive.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most commonly used machine learning algorithms included support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and random forest. The predictions and classification tasks are done based on the features from datasets (Kootstra et al, 2020). Machine learning can be applied to many fields such as computer vision, where it is unworkable to create traditional algorithms to perform the tasks required.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, ever since the seminal works of Buswell [ 15 ] and Yarbus [ 16 ], we have been aware that eye movements are foremost driven by task type (top-down) and visual saliency (bottom-up). Later on, it has been shown more reliably that task type–such as search or free-viewing–influences gaze behaviour [ 17 19 ], and that oculomotor metrics besides pupil dilation [ 20 ] and peak saccade velocity (e.g., saccade amplitude, fixation duration) can provide sufficient information for machine learning algorithms to predict task type at above chance level [ 21 , 22 ]. In this manuscript, we describe that, besides top-down and bottom-up mechanisms, arousal–estimated by the link to heart rate–also contributes to eye movements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%