2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.1520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine‐learning‐based reliability evaluation framework for power distribution networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to compare the evaluation accuracy of four methods, the success failure type, exponential type system and hybrid system are selected as the research objects to compare and analyze the evaluation accuracy of the second-order moment equivalent method, RLS method, ME method and Chebyshev expansion method. In the calculation example, Chebyshev expansion method and RLS method calculate the first eight moments, and ME method selects the first four order moments of the system for calculation [12].…”
Section: Accuracy Comparison Of Various Bayes Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare the evaluation accuracy of four methods, the success failure type, exponential type system and hybrid system are selected as the research objects to compare and analyze the evaluation accuracy of the second-order moment equivalent method, RLS method, ME method and Chebyshev expansion method. In the calculation example, Chebyshev expansion method and RLS method calculate the first eight moments, and ME method selects the first four order moments of the system for calculation [12].…”
Section: Accuracy Comparison Of Various Bayes Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the chronological state transition process for all components can be obtained. On this basis, the system state consists of the state of all components that can be determined according to the sequence of component state changes [32]. The scenario generation algorithm is shown in Algorithm 1.…”
Section: Scenario Generation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…normal operation and fault state) model is used to depict the state transition of distribution system components, for example, transformers, overhead lines, cables, isolating switches, fuses etc. [32], as shown in Figure 3, where 𝜆 represents the component failure rate and 𝜇 represents the component failure repaired rate. The component state is represented by a binary value (0 for fault state and 1 for normal operation state).…”
Section: Component State and Supply-demand Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…transformers, overhead lines, cables, isolating switches, fuses etc. [26], as shown in Fig. 3, where λ represents the component failure rate and µ represents the component failure repaired rate.…”
Section: Component State and Supply-demand Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the chronological state transition process for all components can be obtained. On this basis, the system state consists of the state of all components that can be determined according to the sequence of component state changes [26]. The scenario generation algorithm is shown in Algorithm 1.…”
Section: Scenario Generation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%