Proceedings of the 2021 1st International Conference on Control and Intelligent Robotics 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3473714.3473749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such disparities in the accuracy of prediction may have been expected and are normal -due to errors of false-positives, true-negatives, false-negatives, and true-negatives in agreement with [61], [129]- [131] as in Table 2 and figure 1. The ensemble during the retraining or cross-validation phase -over a series of iterations (movement) yields an accuracy prediction of 99.6 percent (i.e.…”
Section: Training Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Such disparities in the accuracy of prediction may have been expected and are normal -due to errors of false-positives, true-negatives, false-negatives, and true-negatives in agreement with [61], [129]- [131] as in Table 2 and figure 1. The ensemble during the retraining or cross-validation phase -over a series of iterations (movement) yields an accuracy prediction of 99.6 percent (i.e.…”
Section: Training Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The hybrid favours the use of a second hidden layer with greater value for f-score, which agrees with the findings. (Gao et al, 2021;Yuan & Wu, 2021;Zareapoor & Shamsolmoali, 2015 Ojugo & Eboka, 2020a;Ojugo & Otakore, 2020a;Ojugo & Yoro, 2020b). Also, 276 cases were incorrectly identified as fraud transactions and as false negative and 233 cases were correctly identified as malicious instances, these were marked as true-negative.…”
Section: Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…true-positives). The result showed that 31detected cases were erroneously labeled and agreed with [75]- [77] as false-positive; Also, 776 wrongly detected threats (i.e. false-negative) and 283-correctly recognized malicious instances labeled as true-negative.…”
Section: B Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%