2019
DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2910220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning for Real-Time Diagnostics of Cold Atmospheric Plasma Sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, predictive modeling with machine learning is emerging as a ubiquitous technology, and its scope and application to material science and specifically to material design is receiving significant research attention. There are reported works on using machine learning algorithms to model plasma surface interactions occurring in a given target [118][119][120]. Employing machine-learning-based models not only helps to predict a given outcome, but it also opens possibilities to find the optimal and desired parameter combinations that would be ideal for the deposition process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, predictive modeling with machine learning is emerging as a ubiquitous technology, and its scope and application to material science and specifically to material design is receiving significant research attention. There are reported works on using machine learning algorithms to model plasma surface interactions occurring in a given target [118][119][120]. Employing machine-learning-based models not only helps to predict a given outcome, but it also opens possibilities to find the optimal and desired parameter combinations that would be ideal for the deposition process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the label) can take various forms, including discrete components in classification methods, real-valued components in regression methods, or a mixture of discrete and real-valued components. In plasma applications, output can range from chemical, physical, and electrical properties of a target surface [4][5][6] to plasma properties such as degrees of molecular gas dissociation, plasma density, electron energy, neutral species rotational and vibrational temperature [6], or energetic and angular distribution of sputtered particles [7]. Input features for these ML applications in a plasma context can include, for example, optical emission spectra, current-voltage signals, electro-acoustic emission measurements, laser-induced fluorescence data, mass spectrometry data, and visual imaging.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We envision that ML will become indispensable for addressing major science and technological challenges in NEPs in the years ahead. [4,22], learning inexpensive surrogate models from theoretical simulation data [7], plasma dose quantification Selection of relevant input features for building simpler models from data [5] Diagnostics Inference of plasma and surface properties from spectral data [6,10,32], Extraction of latent information from measurements [46][47][48], Detection of abnormal drifts and variabilities [6] Process control…”
Section: Machine Learning For Process Control Of Nepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Studies have utilized machine learning for various purposes such as gas-phase analysis, [22,23] material characterization, [24] and process monitoring and control. [25,26] In addition, our previous study introduced the algorithm of artificial neural network (ANN) for plasma OES analysis to predict the conductivity of aqueous solution in which plasma is ignited. [27] The results show that employing ANN greatly improves the prediction accuracy of the solution conductivity, with the mean square error (MSE) being three orders of magnitude lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%