2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3707796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning for Realised Volatility Forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We select the entries concerning all the stocks included in the S&P 500 index 3 as our universe. Compared with other researches (5 stocks in Mäkinen et al (2019), 23 stocks in Rahimikia and Poon (2020b)), this large selection of around 500 stocks also covers some less liquid stocks. We will show that it is more difficult to have a good prediction on less liquid stocks in Section 5.5.1.…”
Section: Lob Datamentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We select the entries concerning all the stocks included in the S&P 500 index 3 as our universe. Compared with other researches (5 stocks in Mäkinen et al (2019), 23 stocks in Rahimikia and Poon (2020b)), this large selection of around 500 stocks also covers some less liquid stocks. We will show that it is more difficult to have a good prediction on less liquid stocks in Section 5.5.1.…”
Section: Lob Datamentioning
confidence: 87%
“…(LOB) data, showing that the use of LOB data can lead to better predicting results. More recently, Rahimikia and Poon (2020b) and Zhang and Rosenbaum (2020) use machine learning techniques such as Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) to improve such predictions.…”
Section: Introduce Several Simple Volatility Estimators Based On Limi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Rahimikia and Poon (2020a) and Rahimikia and Poon (2020b) propose a HAR model augmented by an ANN applied to HF limited order book information and news sentiment data. In both papers, the authors find a superior forecasting performance of their model compared to the HAR benchmark.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Xiong et al [60] have applied LSTMs to forecast S&P 500 volatility, with Google domestic trends as predictors, and Bucci [13] has demonstrated that RNNs are able to outperform all the traditional econometric methods in forecasting monthly volatility of the S&P index. More recently, Rahimikia and Poon [55] have compared machine learning models with HAR models for forecasting daily realized volatility by using variables extracted from limit order books and news. Li and Tang [48] have proposed a simple average ensemble model combining multiple machine learning algorithms for forecasting daily (and monthly) realized volatility, and Christensen et al [19] have examined the performance of machine learning models in forecasting one-day-ahead realized volatility with firm-specific characteristics and macroeconomic indicators.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the predictive performance for RV forecasts, we compute the following metrics 7 on the out-of-sample data (see [52,29,51,11,13,55]).…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%