2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14237833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning for Solving Charging Infrastructure Planning Problems: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract: As a result of environmental pollution and the ever-growing demand for energy, there has been a shift from conventional vehicles towards electric vehicles (EVs). Public acceptance of EVs and their large-scale deployment raises requires a fully operational charging infrastructure. Charging infrastructure planning is an intricate process involving various activities, such as charging station placement, charging demand prediction, and charging scheduling. This planning process involves interactions between power … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, unsupervised techniques such as k-means clustering, Gaussian mixture model, and kernel density estimator have been employed for this purpose across various research studies. As an example, Random Forest [29] and SVM [30] were employed for predicting the charging capacity of a charging infrastructure. The former supports the adoption of Random Forest, asserting that the SVM is inadequate due to its lack of universality and limitations in handling data.…”
Section: Load Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, unsupervised techniques such as k-means clustering, Gaussian mixture model, and kernel density estimator have been employed for this purpose across various research studies. As an example, Random Forest [29] and SVM [30] were employed for predicting the charging capacity of a charging infrastructure. The former supports the adoption of Random Forest, asserting that the SVM is inadequate due to its lack of universality and limitations in handling data.…”
Section: Load Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the critical impacts of grid-tied EVs is presented in [21], where the authors focused on the interaction of EVs in a smart grid environment. In [22], the issues of charging infrastructure are also presented and the authors presented a critical review on applications of machine learning for solving the issues around infrastructure planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the bulk of this systematic review done in [26] also focused on the various technological challenges associated with integrating EVs into smart grids and smart cities, particularly the problems of charging infrastructure. As seen in [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], most reviews and research papers concerning the risks and challenges of integrating electric vehicles into smart cities are focused on technical challenges. However, there are other associated risks and challenges associated with EV integration into smart cities, such as the security risks of electric vehicle infrastructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Battery SoC and time series load curve are used in [7], [8] not only to route the EVs towards appropriate charging stations but to suggest the type of charging also. The charging station environment discussed in [9] uses pre-defined timings with variable pricing for the charging of EVs without considering the practicality in detail. Charging demand prediction, site selection, utilization of the charger, pricing and scheduling are the key points involved in the infrastructure planning of EVCS reported in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%