2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01754-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning in continuous casting of steel: a state-of-the-art survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the above formulas, Abn-Recall is the probability that abnormal slabs are correctly predicted, N-Recall is the recall rate of normal slabs, G_mean is the comprehensive tradeoff between Abn-Recall and N-Recall, MCC was first used in biomedical filed [33], and also applicable to the assessment of class imbalance [7], [34]. In addition, the range of MCC is [-1,1], -1 means that the predicted result is completely inconsistent with reality, 0 indicates that the predicted result is not as good as the random prediction, 1 denotes that the prediction is absolutely consistent with the actual, and the closer the value is to 1, the better the model performance will be.…”
Section: B Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the above formulas, Abn-Recall is the probability that abnormal slabs are correctly predicted, N-Recall is the recall rate of normal slabs, G_mean is the comprehensive tradeoff between Abn-Recall and N-Recall, MCC was first used in biomedical filed [33], and also applicable to the assessment of class imbalance [7], [34]. In addition, the range of MCC is [-1,1], -1 means that the predicted result is completely inconsistent with reality, 0 indicates that the predicted result is not as good as the random prediction, 1 denotes that the prediction is absolutely consistent with the actual, and the closer the value is to 1, the better the model performance will be.…”
Section: B Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the aforementioned methods, new machine-learning-based approaches can consider the effect of more process parameters on slab quality, and build the mapping model between the parameters and the corresponding slab quality by adopting the supervised learning methods [7]. Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, this complexity, the increasing global competition, and the drive for more efficient lower waste production created a high demand for new methods to optimize the steel production processes and the mechanical properties of final products. [ 1 ] In such a technology‐intensive industry, even the smallest variation during the production process causes costly and time‐consuming post‐processing or an increase in scrappage. [ 2 ] Therefore, smart, agile data‐driven prediction models are necessary and urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of these components of data‐driven modeling comes with a challenge, especially when considered in the context of steelmaking optimization. The “class imbalance,” [ 1 ] i.e., the extensive variation in data classes such as steel grades, subgrades, target composition, and process variables each with limited data per combinatorial group, still remains one of the main challenges in the data‐driven modeling for the steel industry. [ 11,12 ] Further, the correlations between variables and targets are hardly reflected in the data which brings significant obstacles to data‐driven modeling and prediction of material properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural networks have been wildly used in continuous casting production, including breakout prediction, steel defect prediction, nozzle clogging detection, steel temperature prediction and mold level fluctuation detection, etc. [22]. Normanton et al [23] introduced the work conducted by the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) for the surface and internal quality prediction of continuous casting products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%