2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/dasc50938.2020.9256484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning of Air Traffic Controller Command Extraction Models for Speech Recognition Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WERs for all datasets, particularly ANS CR and ACG are much higher as compared to what was reported in(Helmke et al 2020) because of some updates made to the transcription rules for callsign designators. The gold transcriptions were updated accordingly, but the automatic transcriptions were not modified in order to show the potential of the callsign extraction algorithm also on noise data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The WERs for all datasets, particularly ANS CR and ACG are much higher as compared to what was reported in(Helmke et al 2020) because of some updates made to the transcription rules for callsign designators. The gold transcriptions were updated accordingly, but the automatic transcriptions were not modified in order to show the potential of the callsign extraction algorithm also on noise data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Authors in [91] show that in every hundredth ATC communication, an error may occur, and in [92], the authors show that the error may occur in every sixteenth communication. The possibility to detect such error still remains a challenge, as shown in this recent work [93]. Although, in general, read-back errors are quite rare, preventing even one incident due to automatic RBED can make an important difference in ensuring ATM safety.…”
Section: Read-back Error Detectionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…10, it can be seen that the CER metric has apparent limitations when measuring the performance of an ATC speech recognition system from the perspective of the effectiveness of control instructions. (2) The DCNN model has the worst generalization ability. In Table 10, the CER of DCNN is 7.5% in the test dataset with the same distribution as the training data.…”
Section: Robustness Verification Of Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, ensuring the effective transmission of ATC instruction information is crucial for air traffic safety. In ATC, control instructions are primarily conveyed through pilot-controller voice communications (PCVCs) [1,2] indicates that digital automation is critical in addressing challenges in air traffic flow management (ATFM), such as safety, capacity, efficiency, and environmental aspects, and future Controller-Pilot Data Link Communication (CPDLC) will replace PCVCs. Currently, the Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) is promoting intelligent air traffic management (ATM), which includes key technologies such as multimodal fusion, ASR, ATC instructions intent recognition, automatic response to ATC instructions, and semantic verification of ATC instructions [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%