2019
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.99.032142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning of phase transitions in the percolation andXYmodels

Abstract: In this paper, we apply machine learning methods to study phase transitions in certain statistical mechanical models on the two dimensional lattices, whose transitions involve non-local or topological properties, including site and bond percolations, the XY model and the generalized XY model. We find that using just one hidden layer in a fully-connected neural network, the percolation transition can be learned and the data collapse by using the average output layer gives correct estimate of the critical expone… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One is a higher BKT transition, T 2 , between the disordered phase and the BKT phase of QLRO, and the other is a lower transition, T 1 , between the BKT phase and the ordered phase. The recent numerical estimates of T 1 and T 2 for the 6-state clock model are 0.701 (5) and 0.898(5), respectively [18]. The output layer averaged over a test set as a function of T for the 2D 6state clock model is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Machine-learning Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is a higher BKT transition, T 2 , between the disordered phase and the BKT phase of QLRO, and the other is a lower transition, T 1 , between the BKT phase and the ordered phase. The recent numerical estimates of T 1 and T 2 for the 6-state clock model are 0.701 (5) and 0.898(5), respectively [18]. The output layer averaged over a test set as a function of T for the 2D 6state clock model is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Machine-learning Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of modern statistical methods to identify transitions between phases with well-defined order parameters in materials has become quite common [5]. The recent theme in the physics and engineering communities is the application of machine learning methods so that the identification of a precise characterization parameter is avoided and automatic detection is achieved [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, the absence of detailed knowledge may lead to overfitting artifacts and unsuccessful machine learning training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in the implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for physical systems, particularly those that can be formulated on a lattice, show promising evidence in identifying the underlying phase structures [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. The methods such as the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) [21,22,26,30], Supervised Machine Learning [23,29,31] (ML) and auto-encoders [26,25] are shown to be able to identify different phases of classical statistical systems, such as the two-dimensional Ising model. These techniques have also been applied on quantum statistical systems, such as the Hubbard model [24], which describes the transition between conducting and insulating systems.…”
Section: Machine Learning and Qftmentioning
confidence: 99%