Machine Learning Outperforms Logistic Regression Analysis to Predict Next-Season NHL Player Injury: An Analysis of 2322 Players From 2007 to 2017

Abstract

Background: The opportunity to quantitatively predict next-season injury risk in the National Hockey League (NHL) has become a reality with the advent of advanced computational processors and machine learning (ML) architecture. Unlike static regression analyses that provide a momentary prediction, ML algorithms are dynamic in that they are readily capable of imbibing historical data to build a framework that improves with additive data. Purpose: To (1) characterize the epidemiology of publicly reported NHL injuries from 2007 to 2017, (2) determine the validity of a machine learning model in predicting next-season injury risk for both goalies and position players, and (3) compare the performance of modern ML algorithms versus logistic regression (LR) analyses. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: Professional NHL player data were compiled for the years 2007 to 2017 from 2 publicly reported databases in the absence of an official NHL-approved database. Attributes acquired from each NHL player from each professional year included age, 85 performance metrics, and injury history. A total of 5 ML algorithms were created for both position player and goalie data: random forest, K Nearest Neighbors, Naïve Bayes, XGBoost, and Top 3 Ensemble. LR was also performed for both position player and goalie data. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) primarily determined validation. Results: Player data were generated from 2109 position players and 213 goalies. For models predicting next-season injury risk for position players, XGBoost performed the best with an AUC of 0.948, compared with an AUC of 0.937 for LR ( P < .0001). For models predicting next-season injury risk for goalies, XGBoost had the highest AUC with 0.956, compared with an AUC of 0.947 for LR ( P < .0001). Conclusion: Advanced ML models such as XGBoost outperformed LR and demonstrated good to excellent capability of predicting whether a publicly reportable injury is likely to occur the next season.

Artificial intelligence and leukocyte epigenomics: Evaluation and prediction of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease

“…Prior publications suggest however that ML approaches might be superior to conventional statistical methods such as logistic regression analysis for group discrimination and risk prediction. [ 35 ]. Thus, direct AI analysis of the entire CpG data-space may improve AD prediction.…”

Machine Learning for Predicting Lower Extremity Muscle Strain in National Basketball Association Athletes

“…On evaluation of the predictive models, both the complete and simple XGBoost models outperformed the logistic regression on both discrimination and the Brier score. Investigators have previously developed machine learning injury-prediction models for recreational athletes 17 as well as in professional sports, including the NFL, 42 National Hockey League, 26 and MLB. 18 These models utilized a range of inputs, from performance metrics to video recordings and motion kinematics.…”

Effect of Preoperative Imaging and Patient Factors on Clinically Meaningful Outcomes and Quality of Life After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation: A Machine Learning Analysis of Cartilage Defects of the Knee

“…More than just an increasingly popular statistical analysis, ML has been demonstrated in the sports literature to outperform multivariate and regression-based analyses in terms of predicting player injury in Major League Baseball and the National Hockey League. 12,16 As such, ML modeling offers the intrinsic capability and competitive advantage of analyzing contributions of multiple variables simultaneously and learning the weighted value of complex relationships. In this case, ML was chosen as the ideal tool since the relationship between preoperative imaging, baseline PROMs, and patient demographics and meaningful postoperative outcomes after OCA of the knee has never been described.…”