2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12038-019-9909-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine-learning techniques for the prediction of protein–protein interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, a support vector machine (SVM) based machine learning (ML) approach was used to differentiate and classify samples based on their antibody response to three target antigens (S1, S1S2, and Nuc). ML approaches have been used extensively for classification and diagnosis when data from multiple biomarkers or targets is available ( Sarkar and Saha, 2019 ; Uddin et al, 2019 ). SVM software (LibSVM) ( Chang and Lin, 2011 ) was trained using GC-FP data from serum samples ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, a support vector machine (SVM) based machine learning (ML) approach was used to differentiate and classify samples based on their antibody response to three target antigens (S1, S1S2, and Nuc). ML approaches have been used extensively for classification and diagnosis when data from multiple biomarkers or targets is available ( Sarkar and Saha, 2019 ; Uddin et al, 2019 ). SVM software (LibSVM) ( Chang and Lin, 2011 ) was trained using GC-FP data from serum samples ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the use of statistical and contact potentials [7][8][9][10] , design of novel sampling schemes, 11,12 generation of weighted energy or score functions, [13][14][15][16] and employment of supervised machine learning techniques. [17][18][19][20][21] Additionally, within the Rosetta Modelling Suite, new sampling schemes, designed to mimic protein motions observed in solution, have afforded increased predictive accuracy. 11,22 Though these methods have shown some notable success, there is still a need for a single, generalizable, and facile approach capable of accurately predicting ΔΔG's of mutations at protein/protein interfaces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main hypothesis of this method is that two interacting proteins may co-express under specific phenotypes. Proteins with high similar expression patterns might interact as the co-expressed genes or proteins tend to be involved in the same pathways and biological processes (Wolfe et al 2005 (Sarkar & Saha 2019). The selection of ML-based method depends on the input protein features, and the accuracies of the predicted PPIs were higher when more than one feature was included into the analysis (Tahir & Hayat 2017;Chen et al 2019b).…”
Section: Computational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%