2020
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine Learning techniques in breast cancer prognosis prediction: A primary evaluation

Abstract: More than 750 000 women in Italy are surviving a diagnosis of breast cancer. A large body of literature tells us which characteristics impact the most on their prognosis. However, the prediction of each disease course and then the establishment of a therapeutic plan and follow-up tailored to the patient is still very complicated.In order to address this issue, a multidisciplinary approach has become widely accepted, while the Multigene Signature Panels and the Nottingham Prognostic Index are still discussed op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As breast cancer is characterized by tumor heterogeneity [ 42 , 43 ], which is also the main reason that leads to the complexity of treatment [ 44 ], a more reliable model with prediction value is urgently needed. Although there have been several signatures constructed for predicting the prognosis of patients with breast cancer [ 45 47 ], the relationship between these indicators and breast cancer remains unclear. Then, using the six identified CDM genes, we established a risk model with prognostic value for patients with breast cancer by combining the data from the TCGA training set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As breast cancer is characterized by tumor heterogeneity [ 42 , 43 ], which is also the main reason that leads to the complexity of treatment [ 44 ], a more reliable model with prediction value is urgently needed. Although there have been several signatures constructed for predicting the prognosis of patients with breast cancer [ 45 47 ], the relationship between these indicators and breast cancer remains unclear. Then, using the six identified CDM genes, we established a risk model with prognostic value for patients with breast cancer by combining the data from the TCGA training set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous machine learning models of BC prognosis prediction were developed using baseline clinical and pathologic information (30)(31)(32). Most of those studies used pathologic information and additional molecular information, such as the intrinsic subtype at BC diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, machine learning models of prognosis and outcomes have become popular methods to identify new candidate biomarkers in cancer [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] . Diverse machine learning methods, including support vector machines [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] , Bayesian networks [27] , [28] , [29] , and neural networks [30] , [31] , [32] , have used molecular and/or clinical markers to predict cancer prognosis. Because machine learning models are robust to a variety of challenges faced by traditional statistical models, they have the potential to enable more nuanced therapeutic decision-making than has been previously possible [17] , [18] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%