A key issue in cancer biology is whether oncogenic transformation of different cell types of origin within an adult tissue gives rise to distinct tumor subtypes that differ in their prognosis and/or treatment response. We now show that initiation of prostate tumors in basal or luminal epithelial cells in mouse models results in tumors with distinct molecular signatures that are predictive of human patient outcomes. Furthermore, our analysis of untransformed basal cells reveals an unexpected assay-dependence of their stem cell properties in sphere formation and transplantation assays versus genetic lineage-tracing during prostate regeneration and adult tissue homeostasis. Although oncogenic transformation of basal cells gives rise to tumors with luminal phenotypes, cross-species bioinformatic analyses indicate that luminal origin tumors are more aggressive than basal origin tumors, and identify a molecular signature associated with patient outcome. Our results reveal the inherent plasticity of basal cells, and support a model in which different cells of origin generate distinct molecular subtypes of prostate cancer.

Summary To identify regulatory drivers of prostate cancer malignancy, we have assembled genome-wide regulatory networks (interactomes) for human and mouse prostate cancer from expression profiles of human tumors and of genetically engineered mouse models, respectively. Cross-species computational analysis of these interactomes has identified FOXM1 and CENPF as synergistic master regulators of prostate cancer malignancy. Experimental validation shows that FOXM1 and CENPF function synergistically to promote tumor growth, by coordinated regulation of target gene expression and activation of key signaling pathways associated with prostate cancer malignancy. Furthermore, co-expression of FOXM1 and CENPF is a robust prognostic indicator of poor survival and metastasis. Thus, genome-wide cross-species interrogation of regulatory networks represents a valuable strategy to identify causal mechanisms of human cancer.

Current treatments for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CPRC) that target androgen receptor (AR) signaling improve patient survival, yet ultimately fail. Here we provide novel insights into treatment response for the anti-androgen abiraterone by analyses of a genetically-engineered mouse model (GEMM) with combined inactivation of Trp53 and Pten, which are frequently co-mutated in human CRPC. These NPp53 mice fail to respond to abiraterone, and display accelerated progression to tumors resembling treatment-related CRPC with neuroendocrine differentiation (CRPC-NE) in humans. Cross-species computational analyses identify master regulators of adverse response that are conserved with human CRPC-NE, including the neural differentiation factor SOX11, which promotes neuroendocrine differentiation in cells derived from NPp53 tumors. Furthermore, abiraterone-treated NPp53 prostate tumors contain regions of focal and/or overt neuroendocrine differentiation, distinguished by their proliferative potential. Notably, lineage-tracing in vivo provides definitive and quantitative evidence that focal and overt neuroendocrine regions arise by transdifferentiation of luminal adenocarcinoma cells. These findings underscore principal roles for TP53 and PTEN inactivation in abiraterone resistance and progression from adenocarcinoma to CRPC-NE by transdifferentiation.

Combinatorial activation of PI3-kinase and RAS signaling occurs frequently in advanced prostate cancer and is associated with adverse patient outcome. We now report that the oncogenic Ets variant 4 (Etv4) promotes prostate cancer metastasis in response to coactivation of PI3-kinase and Ras signaling pathways in a genetically engineered mouse model of highly penetrant, metastatic prostate cancer. Using an inducible Cre driver to simultaneously inactivate Pten while activating oncogenic Kras and a fluorescent reporter allele in the prostate epithelium, we performed lineage tracing in vivo to define the temporal and spatial occurrence of prostate tumors, disseminated tumor cells, and metastases. These analyses revealed that though disseminated tumors cells arise early following the initial occurrence of prostate tumors, there is a significant temporal lag in metastasis, which is temporally coincident with the up-regulation of Etv4 expression in primary tumors. Functional studies showed that knockdown of Etv4 in a metastatic cell line derived from the mouse model abrogates the metastatic phenotype but does not affect tumor growth. Notably, expression and activation of ETV4, but not other oncogenic ETS genes, is correlated with activation of both PI3-kinase and Ras signaling in human prostate tumors and metastases. Our findings indicate that ETV4 promotes metastasis in prostate tumors that have activation of PI3-kinase and Ras signaling, and therefore, ETV4 represents a potential target of therapeutic intervention for metastatic prostate cancer. M etastasis is a highly inefficient process that involves multiple steps, including invasion of local stroma, intravasation into the bloodstream and/or lymphatic system, and extravasation into a secondary tissue, which is thought to arise as a consequence of multiple molecular/epigenetic alterations in tumor cells, as well as in the microenvironment of metastatic sites (1-4). Nonetheless, despite its inefficiency, most cancer deaths are due to metastases and our current inability to treat them once they arise. In particular, in prostate cancer, the locally invasive disease has a nearly 100% survival rate, whereas metastatic prostate cancer is very often lethal (5).Recent analyses have identified key molecular pathways that are frequently dysregulated during prostate cancer progression, as a consequence of copy number alterations, chromosomal rearrangements, and other aberrant genetic/epigenetic events (6-10). For example, loss of chromosomal region 8p21 and coincident haploinsufficiency for the NKX3.1 homeobox gene occurs frequently in precursor lesions known as prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and are associated with prostate cancer initiation (11,12). Another early event in prostate tumorigenesis is the formation of the TMPRSS2-ERG rearrangement, which fuses the transmembrane protease TMPRSS2 promoter with the coding region of the ETS transcription factor ERG (13, 14). The TMPRSS2-ERG fusion is highly prevalent in prostate cancer and is associated with disease out...